Two bills (SB 5799 and 5800) were introduced this morning to the state senate that address the recent local kerfuffle over building heights in downtown Olympia. Both bills would limit building heights in Olympia based on how they impact views from the capitol campus.
You can read SB 5799 and 5800 on scribd.
Via email from Jerry Reilly:
The first bill, SB 5799, creates a state capitol campus special height district to protect views from and to the Capitol across the Isthmus. The bill limits new or remodeled buildings to no more that 35 feet. This is the current limit on the isthmus prior to the rezone for which the the city is now seeking state approval.
And, regarding the second bill, which would declare the isthmus portion of downtown as a "shoreline of statewide significance":
The intent section of SB 5800 declares that "The vista is an integral part of the design of the state capitol campus. The state's founders sited the capitol campus in its location principally to take advantage of this expansive vista: Is representative of much of the physical characteristics of very large areas of the state; provides a visual and physical connection between the capitol and Puget Sound; is inspirational; and promotes an appreciation of the scenic grandeur and rich natural resources of our state".
Both of the bills are sponsored locally by senators Karen Fraser and Dan Swecker. They're being referred to the Senate Government Operations and Elections Committee, which is chaired by another co-sponsor, Sen. Darelene Fairly. This likely means that they already have enough support to make it through committee. The last co-sponsor is caucus chair (second in leadership) Sen. Ed Murray. These bills have pretty heavy support it seems.
I know what I think about this (seems a bit heavy handed), but what do you think?
Comments
Once again Emmett scoops the Olympia
City/State Relationship Regarding Money
My understanding is that the State is quite generous with regard for funding of City programs and projects.
well...
mathias
einmaleins
I'm pretty sure both Brad
I'm pretty sure both Brad (covers the Leg) and Matt (platoon reporter) know when bills are introduced and where to look. Taking nothing away from Emmett as I read both bills (5799 is laughable) before today's article.
Thanks, Emmett.
Brad had it up on his blog
Brad had it up on his blog a few hours after me.
On the other hand, I wouldn't say that Brad and Matt got more quotes than me, everyone on the comment thread here is a quote. Just because the assistant city manager, mayor and Jerry Reilly don't post to blogs doesn't mean they can't.
full disclosure
moreso...
...than any other city in WA?
Does Oly get more money than other cities just for for being the capital?
Seems that the State lines up cash for Seattle all the time (and E. WA too =).
Oly is lucky to have the State biz just for trickle-down...think what would happen if folks telecommuted for GOV biz in town? ...some of that cash for Oly would dry up-
-but then maybe property tax would go down?
Oh am I feel Prophetic this morning
Olympia exists because we are the seat of State government. Nothing of consequence is over in this town until the 10,000lb elephant trumpets. Every so often the Legislature likes to remind us Olympians, so humble in our perfection, of the facts.
This latest twist should come as no great suprise as Karen, Sam and Brenden have been politely broadcasting their reservations throughout the debate on the rezone.
And now more prophecy:
Good call on the Zero
And dead on.
It was a bit more hysterical than I predicted
So hysterical in fact the Zero's editorial board developed a case of potty mouth. Butt. They said butt. Hehehe Hehehe Hehehe...
There was a nice piece of Newspeak in the editorial that should not go unmentioned. The Editorial uses the heavily attended public hearing and the flurry of public communication to the city council on the rezone to support their pro-rezone position without mentioning the sentiment in all that public communication ran 80% opposed to the rezone.
I am still an agnostic on the rezone. I just want it debated openly and honestly. The Zip's editorial did neither.
They exceded the hight limits of irony.
Zing!
full disclosure
You should write these
Not to mention hyperbole
Limit on Building Heights
It's interesting that it not only limits heights to 35 feet on new buildings, but remodeled buildings as well. What does that say about the future of the Capitol Center Building?
I hope these bills pass, they would make the likelihood of creating a park on Cheetwoot all the more likely.
Heavy-handed
Hmm...
Fraser and Swecker
Beautiful
Another reminder Oly really belongs to the whole state. If you want to be the Cap City, then there are sacrifices. I'm sure Ellensburg would love to pick up the torch if you guys are not up to it. Frankly, E-Burg makes more sense as a center of government to me.
Maybe the time has come for pro-park and pro-highrise folks to reconsider my compromise idea? Yeah, I know, I'm an eccentric nut. But I still like this concept of a pedestrian-only core as something that will help revitalize downtown Oly businesses and keep the isthmus clear of Babbitt Towers.
When I originally asked people to brainstorm, I was met with why it couldn't be done-- which sort of kills the idea of brainstorming. But I don't accept that kind of defeatism. My idea will work. It deserves serious consideration.
chipping in
full disclosure
Emmitt, they do.
It's in the form of the million and millions in wages paid to state workers living in Olympia and Thurston county.
The less snarky answer is something Oly2012 suggested, a Capital City District.It would return a portion of the state sales tax infrastructure spending.
And the snarkyest answer of all is of course turn Olympia into a petting zoo.
Cap City District
To get one bill passed for another, would be an interesting trade off...
You get your views, we get the money...
Oh I feel so dirty!
mathias
einmaleins
Dirty and dirtier
If a heavy hand is what it takes...
The Citiy's single largest employer speaks.
I wish
mathias
einmaleins