|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 8 users and 52 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by wildleaf on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 8:35pm.
I just went down to City Hall and filed a complaint against the Olympia Police Department.
» I stated that the video shows the Olympia Police ignoring both chain of command and rules of engagement policies. These policies are there to prevent riots from forming out of peaceful demonstrations. Their negligence and stupid bravado caused the event to escalate needlessly putting officers and students in danger. I stated that the Thurston County officers at the car who never felt threatened enough to use crowd control actions were engaged in the process of a peaceful resolution. The Evergreen policewoman had announced to the crowd that she would let him go, after being advised that that would be the best solution, and was in the process of getting his name and contact information. The police on the scene first, and therefore in command of the situation, gave no indication that they approved or condoned the other officers coming in and using force. The police on the outside of the circle did not have a strategically limited position like the cops inside the circle making their use of force seem unwarranted and dangerous to the officers surrounded. The Evergreen policewoman gave no indication that she knew they were coming or that they would be using force. During the forum on Tuesday she stated that she stood up to receive pepper spray in her face. Every indication in the video shown gives the impression that after an hour of the same level of commitment to a peaceful resolution shown by both police and students that letting the man go would have served as a symbolic gesture that would have dispersed the crowd peacefully. The video clearly shows that the students did not induce, or want to face, violence from the police. They demonstrate this by holding peace signs towards the officers who acted violently, an obvious try by some to calm things down. You can also see the immediate emotional mood swing from the determination to peacefully see the man released to outrage and reaction against police violence. I asked for the formation of a citizen police review board, to replace the city auditor, which would have power to ask for disciplinary action. I asked that the officers involved are held responsible and that the crowd control policies are reviewed. Currently complaints of police misconduct are investigated internally by a police officer. The city auditor, who began reviewing cases in 2003, does not investigate the complaints only reviews the outcome of the complaints. Therefore it is not surprising that in four years 29 complaints of excessive force were reported and not one of them was sustained. In fact of the 140 total complaints against the police in the past four years only 15 were sustained, and of the 74 major complaints, which include coercion, untruthfulness, profiling, illegal searches, etc., only 5 were sustained. The worst of those five was one case of discrimination toward a woman with a service dog, three misuse of, or failure to maintain, city property and one for unapproved off duty employment. The Olympia police have a record of major complaints against them, with zero culpability. It is laughable to think that these auditor reports are in any way accurate because they are based off police investigator reports of their own conduct. In a substantial way the current auditor position is used to make sure that the outcomes of internal investigations are written squeaky clean. A citizen review board investigating, instead of just auditing, all major complaints against the police would remove this bias. By proving to be a true avenue for justice on complaints against the police it would encourage people who are afraid of complaining to come forward and state their cases. This would reward cops for acting lawfully and punish those who act unlawfully, cleaning up our police force and repairing its image with the public.
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front p |
Good Luck With That...
Submitted by JstPlnOnry on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 8:47pm.n/t
"A point of view is only a view from a point..." ~ Unknown
See here.
Submitted by Ehver Green on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 9:40pm.I saw it. Thanks!
Submitted by wildleaf on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 9:47pm.Yeah I stole the idea from him and other bloggers. People on this site are way smart. I'm just doing my best to make use of that smartness. Everyone who reads this should click on the link in the comment above if they haven't already!
The Black Car Project http://autovoid.blogspot.com
Please elaborate
Submitted by security_six on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 9:47pm.How did the OPD violate rules of engagement?
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
I have read your "review"
Submitted by Jeff Brigham on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 10:21pm.I have read your "review" and after evaluation, I find that one of the best adjectives to use to describe your thoughts would be delusional. Where do you get the idea that any collection of miscreants from Evergreen should be permitted to restrict law enforcement officers from performing their duty? If you or any other person obstructs a police officer from performing an arrest or performing any other duty as they and their supervisors see fit, then those officers are fully justified in using whatever force is required to instantly remove or disable the obstructions.
Those students that surrounded the Evergreen officer’s car are very lucky to escape without serious injury. If a group of 100 such miscreants surround my car and threaten me, I would, justifiably, be punching the accelerator and have my car moving rapidly. Those protesting in front of the Evergreen Officer’s car are lucky that they did not find themselves protesting from the undercarriage. When these characters engage in acts like that, they are playing with fire and eventually someone will be seriously and possible fatally injured.
The video of this incident clearly shows that the students did induce violence, and clearly did warrant a forceful response from the police. The police officers showed amazing restraint and were very lenient in their treatment of those that were surrounding the police car.
As far as the image of local law enforcement officers; you will find that most of the citizens of Thurston County have a very positive view of their local police. I believe that you will find that your view of the police as the cause of the violence is very much in the minority.
Jeff Brigham
"America’s greatest chapter is still to be written, for the best is yet to come."
President Ronald Reagan
well thank god
Submitted by a.future.with.n... on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 10:32pm.Amen to that! =)
Submitted by Phil Owen on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 10:47pm.got facts?
Submitted by chad360 on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 10:55pm.I'm real curious if you have any facts about any of this?
I have 5 relatives that are currently in LE both here and abroad and what you say "does not jive".
Cops can't use "whatever" force to stop interference with arrest (for example).
And please stop insulting "Evergreen" (TESC)..."miscreants" etc...
...you can express your "points" without all the verbal abuse.
Cops can't use "whatever"
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 1:26am.A cop can't use "whatever" force is necessary but they can just the most reasonable amount of force.
This is the point where being able to articulate why you took a certain action is important. If you can articulate it, you can do it.
And more often than not, the judicial system and Court of Public Opinion is going to side with law enforcement personnel.
We're not talking about stopping the car and beating random citizens. We're talking about whether an officer is justified to use the amount of force they deem necessary - at that given moment - in accomplishing a certain goal.
For instance, if an officer were arresting an individual and you just walked up within an arm's distance, the officer would be justified in punching you in the face. Want to know why? He's already having to deal with one dangerous situation - arresting an individual - and you're taking his attention away from that situation. I promise you every court in America will side the officer in such a scenario.
Fire, I think that we are
Submitted by Jeff Brigham on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 7:58am.Fire, I think that we are saying the same thing. I didn't say whatever force. I said "whatever force is required". You can substitute "necessary" or "reasonable" in place of "required". No problems there.
My point I was making with my second paragraph is not that the officer should have driven over people. My point is that if you get a person scared enough and fearing for their life, like having 100 plus people trapping a lone person in a car, that person may very well strike out with an incredible amount of violence. I can easily see how that officer could have feared for her life and driven out of the crowd.
PS. How are things in the land of the morning calm? Is it cold enough for you? I'll bet it is!! I had two years at Camp Hovey, 1978-80. For the most part it was a good experience.
Take care,
Jeff Brigham
Jeff,I was just trying to
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 4:06pm.Jeff,
I was just trying to re-state what you said in a different way. You never know when a changing the language could make the message go through.
And it doesn't hurt in this instance to send the message more than once.
My experience has been a little negative, mainly because I ended up with a unit that is unorganized. I do a lot of in-processing and have spoken with NCOs/COs coming through and they've said not to judge the Army by Korea.
I'm also a little bitter at circumstance. The Secretary of State is coming to Korea this week and some people were selected to go meet with her, one being my roommate. The reason I couldn't go is because I've already been tasked out to spend the next two weeks at Casey.
And you don't know cold until you've experienced Korea. I don't know how they did it 50 years ago. Cold weather Under Armour is saving my ass, I know that.
Hi Fire, Try not to get
Submitted by Jeff Brigham on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 7:58pm.Hi Fire,
Try not to get discouraged because of one bad unit. I had 20 years in and after that worked for 10 years in the IT department of SPSCC. In both I found that some times were good and sometimes not so good. I think that it's that way with all careers.
I had a similar experience to your Secretary of State visit. President Carter visited Korea in 1979 and stayed overnight at Camp Casey. I didn't get anywhere near him though. I spent all night on guard duty on a nearby hilltop. The Army ringed the hilltops surrounding Casey with troops. Luckily it was the end of June, so the weather was decent!
Take care and try to not get any fingers or toes frozen!
Jeff Brigham
I quote
Submitted by eregular on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 11:01pm.That is a lie! Both my parents are police officers and they would never agree with that statement. A REAL police officer never wants anyone to receive serious injury or worse die unless that will save the life of himself or others.
"If a group of 100 such miscreants surround my car and threaten me, I would, justifiably, be punching the accelerator and have my car moving rapidly."
They do psychological testing to make sure those who are selected as police officers are not as hostile and willing to kill/maim as you seem to be.
Mmmm....
Submitted by security_six on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 10:55pm.I have to agree with some of this. Surround my vehicle and make it impossible to move I'm liable to ram forward and be legally justified.
Given current, accepted practices the cops were pretty restrained.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
the protestors were not going to kill or brutalize the cop
Submitted by eregular on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 11:04pm.So
Submitted by security_six on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 11:07pm.People of color at hip hop shows should be given a free pass? That's how I'm seeing it. Can't arrest the black folk at hip hop shows, it's bad.
Please tell me you were being sarcastic?"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
yes you give them a free pass
Submitted by eregular on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 11:21pm.It was a simple assault, if it actually happened...at most assault IV. Is bringing a guy into custody worth the 25k its gonna cost us THURSTON COUNTY TAX PAYERS to fix the cruiser?
This was a message sent to the police. Its idiotic to believe the cops need to intervene into a crowd of people over assault unless a gun or knife is involved. Olympians will take care of their own. The officer should have taken statements and names/phone numbers to begin with and never taken him into custody especially if she was judging the crowds response to that course of action.
No, a "free pass" should not
Submitted by Jeff Brigham on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 7:19am.It was just simple assault?
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:18am.You might want to pack a toothbrush, people are going to come knocking, and people are going to jail, sooner rather than later.
Sheriff Dan Kimball, referring to videotaped rioters being identified.
Eregular ~ How Do You EVER
Submitted by JstPlnOnry on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 12:47pm.expect anybody to take you seriously again after a statement like
"A point of view is only a view from a point..." ~ Unknown
Look if any of you are
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:14am.Gee, didn't somebody call me a racist repeatedly and even PM me over it because I suggested people might have that attitude?
You might want to pack a toothbrush, people are going to come knocking, and people are going to jail, sooner rather than later.
Sheriff Dan Kimball, referring to videotaped rioters being identified.
What I didn't agree with was
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:26am.Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.! --John Maynard Keynes
thank you Gug for expressing exactly...
Submitted by chad360 on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 10:42am.I don't know what eregular's
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 3:54pm.I didn't just pull the thought out of thin air, it happened before, I suspected it would happen again and I was right.
You might want to pack a toothbrush, people are going to come knocking, and people are going to jail, sooner rather than later.
Sheriff Dan Kimball, referring to videotaped rioters being identified.
Think of it differently.
Submitted by wildleaf on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 11:16pm.Would you consider it smart to arrest a black man who was breaking up a fight at a black power political rally? Dead Prez is political hiphop and he advocates between his songs which have to do with economic, peace, and justice issues. She arrested an innocent black man at a black political rally.
The Black Car Project http://autovoid.blogspot.com
Think of it differently yourself....
Submitted by security_six on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 11:21pm.She arrested a person based on testimony from people. It is called police work. If you did not witness an event, you have to rely on witness statements. Perhaps the witnesses were mistaken in what they saw. That is why there is a level of probable cause, followed by questioning if there is cause.
Was arresting the right thing to do? Dunno, but based on the fact someone specifically complained about him, a certain amount of questioning is in order.
Can't you folks quit playing the race card for a moment?
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
no we can't stop the race card until
Submitted by eregular on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 11:23pm.You miss my point
Submitted by security_six on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 11:24pm.Based on witness testimony/complaints it is justifiable to at least question the person. Regardless of race.
CAN YOU SEE THAT MUCH?
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
So you're going to cry
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:26am.White people aren't the only race guilty of racism. Go down to LA and check out the tensions between the Blacks and Koreans. Or between the Chinese and Filipinos.
You might want to pack a toothbrush, people are going to come knocking, and people are going to jail, sooner rather than later.
Sheriff Dan Kimball, referring to videotaped rioters being identified.
Who is crying oppression here?
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:31am.Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.! --John Maynard Keynes
The guy I was responding to
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:36am.They will play the race card until all cops are minorities. That's the line I'm responding to. As long as there's a single white cop then the minorities are being crushed by the man. I know it's just a handful saying that and believing it.
You might want to pack a toothbrush, people are going to come knocking, and people are going to jail, sooner rather than later.
Sheriff Dan Kimball, referring to videotaped rioters being identified.
Amplification...
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 11:11am....again, not helping the discussion.
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
I point something out, I get
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 4:06pm.You might want to pack a toothbrush, people are going to come knocking, and people are going to jail, sooner rather than later.
Sheriff Dan Kimball, referring to videotaped criminals being identified.
Congratualtions!
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 8:48pm.You found one person to support your theory!
But isn't the point of this to find out ways to help the community learn to deal with situations like this? Not to find polarizing and offensive characterizations that only further drive people apart?
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
Here is a suggestion...
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:14pm.Don't riot. That is a good way for the community to deal with this. Don't destroy emergency vehicles.
Don't blame police for breaking up a crowd after mulitple felony acts have been committed. Pretty simple.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
You go with that.
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:20pm.Let us know how that goes.
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
Works pretty damn good for me.
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:23pm."Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
How do you figure?
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:27pm.Just saying it, as Guglielmo observed, doesn't really change things.
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
As I said it works for me.
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:33pm.I don't riot, and make every effort to avoid dangerous crowds. If other people cannot control their emotions to the level that keeps them from destroying public property then something needs to be looked at.
One simply cannot fault the police for following established procedures to disperse a dangerous crowd.
Perhaps we could examine how to prevent dangerous crowds from forming. I know, I can already hear it "Don't arrest the minorities at hip hop concerts..."
Maybe there is some sort of peculiar wiring in my brain or whatnot, but this level of mob violence does not appeal to me, nor is it something I would seek to engage in.
Why do the local "activist" and "progressive" groups, plus folks at a certain college campus seem to wind up in the midst of these riots?
I know. It's the evil oppressive police. Just won't let them shut down public streets or destroy emergency vehicles. Shame on the oppressive state. Bad state! No donut! Bad! Bad state!
Seriously, why do people have to riot?
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
If you're here for conversation...
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:40pm....then let's conversate. If you're here to make trouble, you can check out at any time. The doors on your right.
You know as well as everyone else, that everyone but a few outliers is on the same page about the behavior of the crowd. Given that there's not much to be done about that (unless you think that carping about Evergreen is "doing" something), we're pretty much limited to what could be different about the police intervention. If you think that's "faulting" the police, then you're not really tracking the conversation very well.
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
Touchy?
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:52pm.I am not a cop, but from watching the video and my somewhat limited understanding of crowd control, plus my own knowledge of what constitutes self defense I'm not sure there is much, if anything that should have changed about the PD response.
I do think this is "faulting" the police. The last two times now there have been riots in Oly there is always a very vocal group who wishes to believe the problems are soley the fault of the police for breaking up a crowd.
Yet few are asking if perhaps the fault lies with the mob. Could it entirely be possible that an illegal mob committing illegal acts deserves what it got?
I believe most of the citizens of Olympia expect a swift and rapid effort to break up rioting mobs, and this calls for pepper spray and batons.
There are a lot of things that could have been different about the police intervention.
Beanbags and rubber bullets could have been launched into the crowd first. Tasers and electrical prods could have been used. Baton rounds could have been fired. Flash bangs could have been deployed.
Instead pepper spray (you know that same stuff little old ladies carry in their purses sometimes?) and batons were used. Both are about as low key in breaking up a crowd that just destroyed an emergency vehicle as you can get.
So I see two things. First establish to the great community that the police acted wrongly, violated laws and procedures and were using excessive force. I don't see that happening. Too many people are supporting the actions AND pissing about TESC. The second is work out newer, and better procedures that would satisfy the small minority who would have police do less than they do now.
Do you have a realistic proposal for crowd control that you could actually sell a PD on?
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
See below.
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 10:39pm.> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
If the wolrd were that simple
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sun, 02/24/2008 - 10:48am.Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.! --John Maynard Keynes
If the police receive
Submitted by Jeff Brigham on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 7:34am.If the police receive reports of assault or requests for assistance from citizens it is their duty to respond, investigate, and if they deem it necessary, to apprehend or arrest suspects. That includes in a “black power political rally” or at Evergreen State College. Dead Prez is NOT one of the people that we citizens of Thurston County have elected or hired to enforce the law and determine guilt or innocence. I don’t believe that we citizens have hired you to do that either.
Jeff BrighamGive up convincing him.
Submitted by wildleaf on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 11:47pm.You can't convince him, and he could google it himself if he cared to change his mind.
Anyways, the more important parts of what I wrote seem to be ignored. The cops in the middle had been chilling for an hour peacefully, the crowd wasn't getting any bigger, people would chant for a bit, get bored, sit on the hill and smoke a cigarette, then someone from the hill would go down and chant a bit more. The cops who came in attacked first from the outside forcing there way to the chilling Thurston County officers, they acted forcefully to get into the spot. This was after the officers in the middle had agreed to let him go. I was there, the police and students were talking to each other in that circle. Nobody was getting aggressive. The cops were cool, the people were doing their thing. The lady was getting his info and telling him an ear full I'm sure about how he will be cooperated and he is lucky this time etc... Then unbeknownst to the officers there, the bad boys roll up and start shoving people to get into the middle, (for what reason, who knows?) then pepper spray is everywhere, guys tie bandannas on their face dump the trash can over and throw trash at the cops, I think I remember one glass bottle thrown and tons of plastic ones. Everyone changed their tone. They started chanting things like 'leave us alone,' 'go away,' kids held up peace signs and attempted to stop the angry people but then the police pepper sprayed several more times. I also saw no effort by the cops to chill people down. I remember when one cop car got stuck in the mud I asked if I could help them push it out, and they told me to go away.
I mean in a hostage situation with some guy with a bomb is threatening to blow up a bank you wouldn't have the negotiator talk to him for an hour and finally get him to the point where he's gonna turn himself in and have your back up unit run in shooting without you knowing it right? That would be stupid, and I think the heros who ran in would get in trouble for failure to follow protocol, using stupid force (not excessive, I should say the cops used stupid force), and would be fired for having the building blow up and the hostages die right?
The Black Car Project http://autovoid.blogspot.com
So, what's wrong with a review?
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 8:41am.Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.! --John Maynard Keynes
I support a citizen review board.
Submitted by Mike on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:31am.I think it is long past time that Olympia had a citizen review board. We can argue forever about whether the OPD used excessive force at the Port or in this instance, we can file complaints at the City, I think it comes to nothing with the current oversight system.
From the ACLU website:
Thanks for bringing the review board idea up again, wildleaf.
But Merwyn
Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:46am.Practical men, who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.! --John Maynard Keynes
The wisdom of arresting a
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 4:16pm.Now, knowing in advance that this crowd was made up of dangerous people, no wonder the backup came ready to rock.
Thanks for the clarification. You're right, a review is in order. It would have been wiser for her to have waited for backup to arrest one single peaceful law-abiding person.
Don't argue with idiots.
Olycop
Citizens Review
Submitted by DJW on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 7:13pm.If I was an Oly PD I don't think I would want citizens from this area reviewing my actions. Just look at some of the comments. I would welcome citizens from outside of Thurston County to review my actions.
I hope this subject goes away with those responsible for acts of vandalism or whatever else being held accountable.
I don't think PDs anywhere
Submitted by Mike on Sun, 02/24/2008 - 8:20am.have wanted citizen oversight boards. That is too bad. Many municipalities have created citizen oversight boards because police in many of these same municipalities have proven to be ineffective at policing themselves. A citizen review board is a significant investment of time and training for the citizens. It should include folks with many points of view about police, crowd control, etc. I would want Drew or somebody like him on a police review board, you would want TFI or S6 or Jeff or somebody like them. It is entirely possible to accommodate diverse points of view on a citizen oversight board.
Thanks again to wildleaf for picking up that issue.
Does anyone condone Jeff threatening bodily harm?
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 8:35pm.Of course, I would never threaten you or surround your car in the first place, so the comparison is false... but you hopefully get the picture that tossing around threats gets us right back to the military mindset you seem to love.
Oh, I get it. You've never actually served in combat, have you?
Drew, Why don't you try
Submitted by Jeff Brigham on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:04pm.Why don't you try reading what I wrote before commenting? It would help you avoid writing a comment so ridiculous.
To make it easier for you, here is the entire paragraph. I have bolded certain parts.
"Those students that surrounded the Evergreen officer’s car are very lucky to escape without serious injury. "If a group of 100 such miscreants surround my car and threaten me, I would, justifiably, be punching the accelerator and have my car moving rapidly. Those protesting in front of the Evergreen Officer’s car are lucky that they did not find themselves protesting from the undercarriage. When these characters engage in acts like that, they are playing with fire and eventually someone will be seriously and possible fatally injured."
Also read the paragraph that I wrote in my conversation with TFI. Here it is:
"My point I was making with my second paragraph is not that the officer should have driven over people. My point is that if you get a person scared enough and fearing for their life, like having 100 plus people trapping a lone person in a car, that person may very well strike out with an incredible amount of violence. I can easily see how that officer could have feared for her life and driven out of the crowd."
Reading previous comments first would assist you in writing an intelligent comment yourself.
Jeff Brigham
Jeff
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Wed, 02/27/2008 - 11:12pm.Harley Moniz
Submitted by security_six on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:16pm.Made every effort to avoid apprehension including a dangerous high speed chase. He then rammed a WSP car. Assault. I would have fired on him as well and after such circumstances been well within the law.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
Moniz
Submitted by DJW on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 9:51pm.Sometimes I wonder why I ever get sucked into some of these arguments, but I guess it's the same as waiting for the car wreck. Moniz threatended everyone else on the road the day he chose to be a felon. After numerous opportunities to 'stop' and take his medicine he again made a stupid choice.
I also find it amazing that there are so many experts (on both sides) who claim to know what OPD's standards are and how they should be applied in every situation. Come on people, we are talking about humans not robots. They assess the situation and use the best possible judgment based on training and procedures. It sure is nice to sit on the sidelines and throw stones (no pun intended) and tell everyone that the cops did something wrong. If I was that officer I would have felt a little threatened due to the environment. And no I'm not talking about race, I'm talking about the general attitude of the vocal anti-government, cop, whatever attitude that runs around TESC.
The fact that there are people who are condoning the surrounding of a police officer who is trying to do her job is beyond me. Call it for what it is, disrespect for the person, position and for the rest of us. Could this riot been avoided? Heck yes. But I don't blame the cops for this. They reacted to a situation and I want to believe they had the best of intentions.
missing the point entirely...
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Wed, 02/27/2008 - 11:14pm.May Day 2007
Submitted by Rick on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 10:42pm.As near as I can tell, the kinds of actions that S6 and other are describing (batons, non-lethals) are not allowed in large PDs (e.g., LAPD), as evidenced by the following video and report.
Here are a few excerpts from the report that came out after excessive use of force by the LAPD
Source
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
As near as I can tell, the
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Sun, 02/24/2008 - 1:54am.I can't watch the video for some reason, but I went and read the report (at least on the front page; I didn't open the pdf).
The Los Angeles Police Department has a lot of baggage. At one point (and this may still be true), the federal government stepped in to monitor the department. Anytime there's an event with a lot of negative publicity - especially when racial and ethnic minorities are involved - the LAPD is going to get slapped around. It's a police department and - just like every police department - its leadership answers to local politicians.
I didn't get from my reading that such actions are "not allowed." Just that a better job needs to be done in the future of articulating why action was necessary.
Also, the report pointed out training had not been completed in the 18 months prior to the incident. I doubt the department is going to undergo a training overhaul; rather, it's going to ensure training is completed every X-amount of months so that this block is checked off in the future.
As far as I can tell, nobody was disciplined or named in a civil suit. This indicates to me that the actions the LAPD took simply fell into a gray area and maybe - according to people who sit in an office all day - actions taken need to more clearly defined in the future.
Notice how you never see a sheriff's department in the news? I doubt there's very much differential between the two in terms of operating proceedure. One just has to interest groups and committees while the other answers directly to voters.
I'll bet you $5 it won't happen
Submitted by Norm on Sun, 02/24/2008 - 12:01pm.People don't have a right to pick the punished.
Submitted by wildleaf on Sun, 02/24/2008 - 12:14pm.I think people want responsibility to fall on those responsible and I think people want accountability and justice. The public is only allowed to have justice if it is blind, and if blind justice points its finger at the police then the public will respect that. I'm raising awareness of this issue so I don't see this happen again. I think the public wants that more than they want to see some kids thrown in jail. If they end up being able to make a case against the crowd involved so be it, but I doubt they would have a very good one at this point.
The media of course has been very helpful at making the public view things a certain way. Why didn't the media dig harder for video and properly analyze it before jumping to conclusions.
The Black Car Project http://autovoid.blogspot.com
I think some of the public has seen the video
Submitted by Norm on Sun, 02/24/2008 - 12:18pm.Norm...
Submitted by JstPlnOnry on Sun, 02/24/2008 - 5:31pm.I'd high 5 ya right now if I could!
"A point of view is only a view from a point..." ~ Unknown
Zackly!!
Submitted by JT on Sun, 02/24/2008 - 4:59pm."thinks your "account" of the event is so deep in left field that the stadium lights no longer hit you. The crowd is incredibly lucky that the police had the restraint that they did, and the cops are lucky that the crowd didn't turn worse. The crowd was wrong, end of the story for me....and others I might add.
"so deep in left field that the stadium lights no longer hit you." I blew coffee all over the monitor with that one Norm,,,,so true!!
No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits. Climate change provides the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world ever.Christine Stewart (the real basis for the AGW scare)
Network Solutions
Submitted by Ehver Green on Sun, 02/24/2008 - 5:33pm.We are all one community
Submitted by lovelife on Wed, 02/27/2008 - 12:56am.Well said
Submitted by security_six on Wed, 02/27/2008 - 12:49pm.and well written. Glad to see someone else with this viewpoint.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
Agreed.
Submitted by Rick on Wed, 02/27/2008 - 12:58pm.I'd like this to apply both ways, however, as it is clear that stereotypes are flying in all directions.
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
Thank You Lovelife!
Submitted by JstPlnOnry on Wed, 02/27/2008 - 3:06pm.I agree with you 100%!
Welcome aboard!
"A point of view is only a view from a point..." ~ Unknown
360-870-3127
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Wed, 02/27/2008 - 11:06pm.The problem is, we are NOT all one community. You don't poison your love, and you would not let your love poison me. But she works for a system, not just an employer, which DOES poison us (you, me, Rick, Security_Six, etc). And she defends this system with armed force, when she does her job - every day she works.
You should read Norm Stamper's book, Breaking Rank. He goes to great lengths to explain how his liberal ideas were mutated by the police, rather than the other way around. And he found out he wasn't so liberal as he thought after all...
Don't be frightened that would be silly.
Submitted by wildleaf on Wed, 02/27/2008 - 11:43pm.I would like to point out that 100% of the major media is unabashably pro police on this issue. I would like you to go onto the Olympian and read their three hundred comments per article about the riot and see how absolutely ogre like those comments are towards students. Then read through this blogs comments and see how absolutely repetitive and mindless the most reactive three or four people are who absolutely adore cops. I could do a count of the pro and con comments but no one would care and we already know the answer to that. Of course, I consider these articles are not journalism they try to make points but I keep them fair, accurate and based in facts. That is more than I can say for the people who respond negatively to these posts.
Also lovelife, we are not a community with the police. I wish we were, I really do, but we are not. They are usually encouraged to not live in the area they work. They also have the ability to shoot me and arrest me. They therefore have a power that sets them apart. That is just how it is. I will say that cops are humans and need to be treated as such.
Also I would like to contend that while you might not have much knowledge of events don't claim that we don't. I was there from beginning to end. That doesn't mean I witnessed everything or understood what was going on exactly all the time while I was there. However I have read every single article in the Olympian, every single e-mail on the evergreen listserve, most olyblog articles and comments, most outside media coverage, have talked to many people involved or who were there, have been to five meetings, watched all three videos many times several times in slow motion, have read and critiqued all of the officer reports and have written pages and pages about it that has been critiqued and responded on olyblog and e-mail lists. I'm not trying to toot my own horn or anything, but I think that you could say that I am an expert on this particular riot.
The Black Car Project http://autovoid.blogspot.com
Who is this "we"?
Submitted by security_six on Thu, 02/28/2008 - 12:45am.we are not a community with the police. I wish we were, I really do, but we are not. They are usually encouraged to not live in the area they work. They also have the ability to shoot me and arrest me. They therefore have a power that sets them apart. That is just how it is. I will say that cops are humans and need to be treated as such.
From what I have heard around Oly, most folks are siding with the cops on this one. At any rate I know a lot of the progressive and reactionary community are unashamedly anti cop, but I do not believe you speak for the whole community.
Second, a brief study of law will show that individual citizens can also arrest and shoot people. The only difference between citizens and cops, is that cops have uniforms and respond to calls for help. You as a citizen can use force to prevent a felony, or to apprehend a fleeing felon. You can use minimal neccessary force to hold a person you have witnessed committing an arrestable misdemeanor... Powers rarely used, but there.
But of course, being the expert on police, police relations with the community and laws regarding policing that you are, you knew that already didn't you?
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
This sounds like trying to score points...
Submitted by Rick on Thu, 02/28/2008 - 12:52am....not further the discussion.
Again: it is not "anti-cop" to believe that the police may not have responded in the most appropriate manner. Can we let that go, please?
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
I could have phrased things differently
Submitted by security_six on Thu, 02/28/2008 - 12:57am.However I do take umbrage at the intemation this is the entire community's viewpoint.
Also, I am surprised at the attempt to place cops on a differnent power level than everyone else. Which is why I pointed out the police powers inherent to evey citizen.
In fact nearly all of wildleaf's postings are quite divisive. Even the title of this blog entry is divisive and inflamatory.
I stand by the overall tone of my post though.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
I believe that wildleaf stipulated...
Submitted by Rick on Thu, 02/28/2008 - 8:08am....that "100% of the major media are with the cops on this." I'll let him explain it him/her self, but what I understood by "we" was something like "the Evergreen community," or maybe "students." If you think he meant the general public, that would be a good thing to clarify -- but I would wait for an answer before getting up in his/her grill about it.
For my part, I find it hard to believe that you don't think there is a power imbalance between cops and the public. Have you seen any of the video of college kids getting tazed at school because they didn't show their student ID after 11:00pm, or the poor Polish guy who was killed at the Vancouver airport for absolutely no reason? Excessive force by police happens all the time, primarily because not everyone is cut out to be a police officer. They are just not cut out to handle the power that society gives them. I don't want to get rid of the cops, but I do want a quality control mechanism that is independent. In a democracy, independent oversight is the only way to prevent abuse.
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
Have you seen any of the
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Thu, 02/28/2008 - 9:18am.If you're referring to the UCLA incident, it wasn't simply because he "refused to show his ID." He refused to cooperate.
Unless we expect law enforcement to ask "pretty please," certain tools are going to be necessary to ensure compliance with the law (or in the UCLA case, regulations).
Killed? I watched that video also and he wasn't killed. He died because of circumstance. It was unfortunate - most certainly - but I don't think the police did anything wrong. They're responding to a call about a man "[flinging] a chair at a glass partition and [tossing] a computer to the floor." (The Canadian Press)
More than likely, Tasers probably will need to be reviewed. I'm certainly not saying done away-with, but reviewed.
But some people's ill reaction to a Taser is not a law enforcement officer's fault. He/she can only use the tools given to them and there's most certainly argument that the Taser - overall - reduces injury among both officers and the people they deal with.
If you've never gone on a ride-along, I'd strongly encourage it. You may not be able - or feel comfortable - doing it in Olympia. In such an event, you can do it with any other local agency or even Tacoma or Seattle. I think it would give people a better understanding of what an individual is going through as they respond to calls during a shift.
You say "pretty please..."
Submitted by Rick on Thu, 02/28/2008 - 10:16am....like it's a bad thing. Please explain that to me. If our police can get the same thing done with less force (and hence less danger to everyone involved), then isn't that best practice?
Edit: There are still two public inquiries pending on that incident (in BC), so I don't think it's exactly fair to say that police acted appropriately. And, if there were an intervention that would have resulted in less force (and thus no death) that was not used, then I do, in fact, think he was killed.
> It's OK to be nice. <
enpen's social contract
I remember watching the tape of that airport incident
Submitted by Guglielmo on Thu, 02/28/2008 - 10:47am.Oh I think the use of Tasers
Submitted by security_six on Thu, 02/28/2008 - 10:48am.Should be limited to more than it is. A good blast of pepper spray from Kimber's JPX Protector or Guardian Angel probably would have done the same job if the person needed subduing...
I don't know enough about individual department procedures on use of Tasers so won't comment much further except to note like any tool, there are uses and misuses.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown
You can hear one of the RCMP
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Thu, 02/28/2008 - 3:06pm.The video I saw was everything in the lobby-area, once they had already made contact with the man and he was acting agitated.
Unless you can tell that the officer was asking in a manner similar to a child asking a parent to play with a new toy, I'd say he was more than likely going over his options. Formulating a "game plan," if you will.
Maybe he's new? Maybe he's inexperienced? Maybe he's nervous? I would say there could be a variety of other reasons - outside of a "predisposition towards a violent resolution" - that the officer would be asking about whether he can use a Taser.
Less inconvenient for the officers or less inconvenient for the general public?
I think a "pretty please" is in order
Submitted by Norm on Thu, 02/28/2008 - 6:14pm.There CAN be a power imbalance
Submitted by security_six on Thu, 02/28/2008 - 10:37am.But there doesn't have to be. I'm not overly familiar with the incidents you refer to, but I do understand that at least in the BC case, there was not a desire to use lethal force, but rather a medical reaction. Tasers are still a new tool and need to be worked with and understood better.
Personally, and maybe it is just my gun totin' tall, full head of hair, white male with a beard empowered self speaking, but I do not see any power imbalance between me and the cops, nor have I found that imbalance exists in Olympia. Despite some rather severe disagreements, I have found that OPD is pretty willing to work with people. I took the services of a lawyer just for grins, and to keep the balance of power level.
I find the ones most likely to complain about this "imbalance of power" are the very ones come into any police encounter with a closed mind, chip on their shoulder and an unwillingness to understand and work with people.
"Safety is a tyrant's tool; no one can be against safety."--Unknown