|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 7 users and 59 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 04/18/2008 - 12:57pm.
Colonel (ret.) Ann Wright visited Olympia yesterday for a series of presentations on Iraq, on official wrongdoing within government, and on her new book, which is published by Koa Books. Dissent, Voices of Conscience: Government Insiders Speak Out Against the War in Iraq is co-authored by Ms. Wright and Susan Dixon. It chronicles the stories of about 25 government and military whistle-blowers who have come forward to expose corruption and wrongdoing in their respective professional settings.
Colonel Wright was a career diplomat with the US State Department. When the US Government, under the dictate of the Bush Administration, launched an invasion in Iraq she resigned her post (along with two other US diplomats.) I saw and listened to Ms. Wright give a presentation (on her experience vís a vís her professional career and Iraq) at South Puget Sound Community College. Her visit was sponsored by Washington Peace Action and BRICK (the SPSCC student group Building Revolution by Increasing Community Knowledge). Ms. Wright opened her talk by expressing solidarity with the PMR movement as it has appeared in Olympia Washington. Ms. Wright expressed her opinion that PMR mobilizations have potential and are promising in terms of mounting an effective resistance to the official illegal actions and wrongdoing of our government of the US of A.
What are the ways that we can stop an unjust, unnecessary war of aggression as it is committed by our government? Especially when the mainstream media is slanted toward support of the official government and White House line of rhetoric, what are the most promising methods of enforcing accountability on a bureaucratic behemoth that is misbehaving, operating in an immoral/unethical manner, and steamrolling human rights, and constitutional and international law? Wright mentioned a few promising prospects:
Wright spoke of increasing problems within government, as well as within the military, and in terms of how the government relates to the military (especially in regard to the present day gov't in Washington D.C. in relation to the undeclared war in Iraq.) Although there were many factors which precipitated her decision to resign, it was the unjust invasion of Iraq that served as the final trigger. And although she was one of only 3 US diplomats to resign, the government of the UK had 4 times as many government officials resign, most notably, the former foreign service secretary, Robin Cook.
Wright made a point of how Iraq did not attack the USA, and how as such, the US invasion was an act of Aggression and hence, illegal - a war crime - under both US and International Law.
Ms. Wright spoke of a few examples of the prominent whistle-blowers and their actions that are detailed in her new book. Jessalyn Radack is a lawyer who worked in the Justice Department's "Office of Ethics" during the opening periods of the War on Terror. She was involved in counseling the government employees who interrogated John Walker Lindh, "The American Taliban." When Lindh was captured in Afghanistan, he was rounded up as part of the "Convoy of Death." This was a somewhat famous incident in which the Northern Alliance piled Taliban forces into containers. With the captives inside, the Northern Allliance fired automatic weapon munitions into the containers (to make air holes.) Many people were injured or killed. Those who survived that horrific experience were subjected to even more torture. The survivors were herded into a dungeon with standing water. The prison keepers doused the water with flammable liquid and ignited it. When Lindh was interrogated his body was scorched; he was duct taped to a stretcher and shivering while suffering from exposed burns. In communication with Radack at the Justice Department, interrogators were informed that anything they gleaned from Lind would not be presentable in a court of law. Radack said that Lindh, as an American Citizen, was entitled to having a lawyer present to advocate for his interests during an interrogation. As such, the results of his questioning could be used for operational purposes, but not legal ones. John Walker Lindh was one of the first subjects of trial for suspicion of terrorism. When Lind was returned to the USA for trial, the 15 or so email communications between Radack and the interrogators in Afghanistan were missing. They weren't included in the report that was sent to the Judge or defense lawyers for Lind's trial. Radack didn't give up, however. She went to an IT expert, who was able to cull the deleted emails from a back-up server. She subsequently printed and copied the emails and sent the copies to multiple sources, the Defense Attorneys, the Judge, and one copy also to Michael Isikoff at Newsweek ("The Lindh Case E-Mails" by Michael Isikoff). Subsequently, Radack was subjected to a DOJ witch hunt, which sought her disbarment (reference Douglas McCollam article). Interestingly enough, the Taliban originated as a student movement in resistance to the brutality of the "Northern Alliance", which was oppressing certain populations in Afghanistan, raping the women, etc. Wright also discussed the case of Sibel Edmonds, who was a translator for the FBI. Edmonds has alleged that translations that she had produced were changed by her supervisor. According to Edmonds, the translations that she produced indicated that a senior government official, Mark Grossman, had been responsible for distributing nuclear secrets to agents of Turkey, who in turn sold the information to authorities of Pakistan. Edmonds was fired for going to a higher supervisor about the improprieties and altered translations. She has since sought remedy for her unjust termination and the governmental wrongdoings at the Congressional level, and otherwise. However, her story has been completely neglected by the US mainstream media. Wright also used the example of Navy Lawyer Matthew Diaz who, after serving 17 years in the Navy was subjected to court-martial, 6 months in military prison and dishonorable discharge after he released the names of Guantanamo detainees to the Washington D.C. legal advocacy oranization, Center for Constitutional Rights. Next up was Joe Darby, who was sitting in a cafeteria at the Abu Ghraib prison compound in Iraq when then Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld appeared for a news conference and referred to him by name as the person who released 29 photos documenting prisoner abuses that were regularly taking place at the time. Darby was evacuated from Iraq for his own safety. He has been put on a government witness protection program and currently lives under an assumed name and identity. Many people have stood up against government abuses and wrongdoing. And there are many more in government who oppose the wrongful and illegal actions of our government, but who feel unable to take a more appropriate and active position of opposition, due to financial and familial concerns and obligations. 31 members of the military have refused service and been court-martialed.
Wright also mentioned the case of illegal wire-taps and how there is a significant will in the current Congress to grant amnesty to tele-com providers who engaged in illicit, unwarranted and warrantless, telephone taps of American citizens. The only company to refuse the taps was Qwest. Interestingly enough, the CEO of Qwest, Joe Nacchio, has faced scrutiny (and fines/prison time) for matters that are seemingly unrelated to the wiretaps, but can best be understood within the current overall political climate of fear and jingoistic nationalism... Thanks to Ann Wright for being there last night and for standing up for human rights, for being there for the American people, and for opposing the illegal actions of our government!
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|
Thanks writing this up Rob.
Submitted by Guglielmo on Fri, 04/18/2008 - 1:50pm.You're Welcome, Jim
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Sat, 04/19/2008 - 6:41am.Taliban...
Submitted by security_six on Fri, 04/18/2008 - 8:33pm.What does mentioning the seemingly benign roots of the Taliban serve? Or is the good Colonel desperate to lump every US military action together as bad and flawed?
I'm hoping we can all agree that the Taliban, irregardless of it's orgins grew and evolved into an extremist organization that greatly limited the rights of women, and imposed a very hard line view of Sharia law on Afghanistan. How many here would wish to live under the old Taliban rule? Show of hands? Anyone? Guy's? Gals?
She really lost me on that one.
"A gun is a tool, Marian. No better, no worse than any other tool. An axe, a shovel, or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.-- ShaneNorthern Alliance
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 04/18/2008 - 9:00pm.If all I had were news reports as a source of information my understanding would be terribly askew and limited. It's clear that the mainstream media in this country is biased toward the goals of global dominance. So we, as patriotic citizens, must dig deeper to find the truth.
Wright's reference to the Taliban was prompted by a comparison to certain present day (local) student groups, like Olympia SDS and BRICK.
Perhaps there is more than meets the eye, perhaps much more than many in government and media would have you believe.
Aldo Leopold: "We abuse land because we regard it as a commodity belonging to us. When we see land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect."
The 80's are over
Submitted by security_six on Fri, 04/18/2008 - 9:08pm.(Last time I checked anyway) It would have been nice to see some clarification as to the context of her statement.
Where did the media rant come from?
I suggest to you a media outlet is what it's users allow it to become. I cannot believe in the leftist myth of controlled media.
I do believe in an apathetic America that allows it's media outlets to be lazy and indifferent. Just like them.
EDIT: Let me add this... on conservative discussion sites I hear the "liberal media" complained about. On liberal sites I hear the "controlled media" complained about. Seems the media is a popular target by everyone, except nobody will agree on what is wrong.
"A gun is a tool, Marian. No better, no worse than any other tool. An axe, a shovel, or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.-- Shaneword
Submitted by Rob Richards on Fri, 04/18/2008 - 9:25pm.Liberal v. Conservative
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Sat, 04/19/2008 - 6:48am.The reason that you hear some people complain about a "liberal" bias in the media is because those people are unhappy when the media even so much as scratches the surface of the current problems with corruption, malfeasance, nonfeasance, lies, misrepresentation, etc.
However, it is clear, upon unbiased investigation that the mainstream media is certainly not biased toward issues of, for example, holding our (s)elected officials accountable when the break the law, or campaign finance reform (along with many other issues.)
The nation's mainstream media does a tremendous disservice to the American People by giving members of the Bush Administration, their foreign policy of global dominance, and their wars of aggression a big wink and a nod.
Aggression and global dominance are not, however, in the national interest. That's my main complaint against the MSM.
Ann Wright is a decent individual
Submitted by s4200 on Sat, 04/19/2008 - 4:33am.Ehren Watada, who refused to
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Sun, 04/20/2008 - 2:34am.Did COL (RET) Wright use Ehren Watada as an example or is this your interpretation of her lecture?
On the other hand...
SGM Peil, Gerald T., "As Long as it Takes", Army Times, 14 April 2008:
SGM Peil would probably say COL (RET) Wright lacked - and continues to lack - the will to win.
This has absolutely nothing to do with the conflict in Iraq or the Global War on Terrorism. According to Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo's Health and Counseling Services section on "Sexual Assault," "approximately 1 in 4 women will be sexually assaulted during their college careers." So while the percentage of sexual assaults in the military may be higher than civilian counterparts, we're not talking about a blowout. Should the number of sexual assaults factor into deciding whether or not to support your alma mater or telling a high schooler whether they should go to college?
I highly doubt they cared. Trying to apply "court of law" - a system which is entirely dependent upon structure and organization - to the battlefield is ridiculous. Going back to the "Will to Win," Western nations, leaders and theologians are too concerned with trivial matters such as whether or not statements gathered on the battlefield can be used "in the court of law" than the bigger picture: winning.
Again, we're not talking about civilians in a peace environment. We're talking about a combatant captured through the course of warfare.
From Douglas MacArthur's farewell speech on 19 April 1951:
I cannot answer, either.
But once war is forced upon us, there is no other alternative than to apply every available means to bring it to a swift end.