|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 7 users and 52 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by Anonymously Larry on Sat, 01/05/2008 - 12:53pm.
All are welcome to post and discuss this issue. The following is a list of bullet points from Mike Huckabee, GOP candidate for President of the United States of America, who recently won the Iowa caucus:
I agree with Huckabee on point 1. On point 2, we start to disagree. I DO separate my philosophical viewpoints from my professional life. For me to push the influence of my secular humanist viewpoint on an Evangelical Christian in a business atmosphere would be inappropriate, in my opinion, thus I expect the same in return from an elected official. Point 3 - Huckabee's language leaves me cold. He appears to be telling us that he is privvy to "real faith", thus the alleged humility becomes somewhat hypocritical, as I see it. I find anyone talking about "real faith" and "less judgemental" in the same sentence, to have not thought it through well enough. Point 4 - Faith and injustice are great buzz words, but I don't see the Republican Party, for whom Huckabee represents, being the poster children for helping the less fortunate. Actions, not words. Point 5 - If Huckabee is true to his word on non-perscriptive faith and truly will represent ALL of Americans, I would expect him to inject "Allah" into his next public prayer. Politically - Huckabee did well in Iowa, as I would expect of an self avowed Evangelical candidate in a Conservative heartland state. Religion is a fundamental issue in those areas, thus the showing by Guiliani. I'm wondering if Huckabee will be a one hit wonder, or will he be able to cross over to the more secular parts of the citizenry. I'm very interested in making this thread a place for open discussion of this or other candidates, so let's contribute and educate each other. Thanks - LH
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|
Point 5 - If Huckabee is
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Sat, 01/05/2008 - 1:05pm.He doesn't need to state "Allah" or even "God".
He can simply use "Divine Providence," "Creator," or "Nature's God."
All three are used in the Declaration of Independence.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with the president - or any elected official, for that matter - acknowledging this country seeks blessing and help from the Creator.
Can't say I totally disagree...
Submitted by Anonymously Larry on Sat, 01/05/2008 - 1:42pm.Well stated
Perhaps you misunderstand or
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Sat, 01/05/2008 - 3:15pm.From a Christian viewpoint not one human is good enough; not even Billy Graham or Mother Theresa or Barb O'Neill. The purest-hearted human is not good enough, we're all corrupted from Original Sin. Not one secular thing we do can absolve us. The whole point of Christianity is that, despite the fact we're worthless, Christ thought we were worth it for Him to pay our debt for us.
I don't know enough of Huckabee to have an opinion one way or the other; perhaps his talk of faith is merely blowing smoke, maybe not. If he's serious about point 3 I find it a very humble statement. He's saying "I can't judge you, because I'm not better than you. In fact, if you're low-down to the ground I am too." When he refers to "real faith" he's merely separating what he means from what someone like Bob Schuyler with his Crystal Cathedral, or any of the numerous charlatans with their luxery cars and silk suits means.
I've never been a Bible thumper, I just call it as It's written.
Maybe the operative word isn't "real"
Submitted by Anonymously Larry on Sat, 01/05/2008 - 3:31pm.Although, that IS the way I interpret the statement.
As a former practicing Christian and now secular humanist, I find that Evangelicals have a tendency to talk about "real" faith and "real" Christianity, on and on et al. It becomes a rather ambiguous qualifying word that gets tossed around like so many leaves in the wind.
You're right, though, Merw, I could be micromanaging the content there.
I understood where you were
Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Sat, 01/05/2008 - 3:40pm.On one side you have "Real Christians" who point to the exact verses to preach that people who aren't like them are destined for Hell; meanwhile on the other side you have "Real Christians" remembering it's not their place to judge anyone and who remember that Christ's final command was "Love as I have loved"