|
|
|||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 2 users and 36 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: OlyBlog is powered by:
Who's new
 |
Submitted by Ehver Green on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 5:30pm.
Rick, is there an issue with comment posting? Twice my comments have been queued and now I just get Access Denied. Rick, as for your comment to DJW - the argument was about Meta and her skipping out on a scheduled event, not Doug. But... I've had at least 20 minutes of face time in public settings with our next Mayor.
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Now playing at: 
Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
 
|
|
|
More Flickr photos tagged with "olympia" and "washington" OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington. |
|||
I don't know
Submitted by enpen on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 5:42pm.I have no idea what's going on. I found another of your comments in the moderation queue and published that, but as for anything else you've posted I can't find any trace of them. Everything on your account looks fine as well.
See, you've hung out with Meta already!
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 5:42pm.Spam filter might be the problem
Submitted by Rick on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 6:24pm.Just keep trying and let us know if you're still blocked.
When you think of the long and gloomy history of man, you will find more hideous crimes have been committed in the name of obedience than have ever been committed in the name of rebellion. -C.P. Snow
Try #1
Submitted by Ehver Green on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 6:51pm.It's magic.
Submitted by Ehver Green on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 6:51pm.It's magic.
EG, I had to post twice to
Submitted by Norm on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 9:35pm.Conspiracy?
Submitted by Ehver Green on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 9:39pm.Against me? I'm sure it was the spam filter - maybe it's too sensitive or something.
one theory
Submitted by enpen on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 9:48pm.Theory: After getting queued up for comment moderation every following attempt to comment is automatically blocked until the original queued comment is given the okay. I have no idea whether or not this theory is valid, I'm merely equating coincidence with cause. It wasn't until I had unspamed your comment in the taser thread that your attempts to comment on other threads were allowed through.
We'll have to test the theory. The next time anyone (who reads this) has a comment swallowed up by the spam filter, try leaving comments on other posts. If this isn't the answer, well...I'll have to go back to theorizing, I suppose.
It just happened to me
Submitted by Anonymously Larry on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 9:11am.http://thurstonblog.blogspot.com/
Spam filter
Submitted by Sarah on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 9:25am."the argument was about"
Submitted by Guglielmo on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 9:27am.How about discussion, does
Submitted by Ehver Green on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 9:44am.How about discussion, does that satisfy you?
Nope
Submitted by Guglielmo on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 9:55am.It? Don't you mean "her"?
Submitted by Norm on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 10:07am.Then what's your point? Do
Submitted by Ehver Green on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 2:35pm.I just thought it was odd that
Submitted by Guglielmo on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 2:45pm.Maybe you should review the
Submitted by Ehver Green on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 2:49pm.Maybe you should review the definition of argument. It was a simple discussion involving differing points of view. You've taken on an all knowing online persona here so I'll agree to disagree and move on.
No argument
Submitted by Guglielmo on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 4:01pm.