User login

Who's online

There are currently 3 users and 39 guests online.

Online users

  • stevenl
  • wilson
  • Locutus

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • Sara Ballard
  • GooseKaler
  • LongRider
  • non illegitimi ...
  • acreatureapart

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by Norm on Fri, 01/11/2008 - 1:45pm.

Senators Push for Guns in National Parks

By MATTHEW DALY – 1 day ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Nearly half the Senate is pushing the Bush administration to let gun owners carry handguns and other firearms into national parks and wildlife refuges.

Forty-seven lawmakers have signed a letter asking Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne to lift Reagan-era restrictions that prevent citizens from carrying readily accessible firearms onto lands managed by the National Park Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Current regulations, developed in the early 1980s, "infringe on the rights of law-abiding gun owners who wish to transport and carry firearms on or across these lands," the senators wrote.

The policies also differ from those of some other federal agencies, such as the Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service. "These inconsistencies in firearms regulations for public lands are confusing, burdensome and unnecessary," said the letter, drafted by Sen. Mike Crapo, R-Idaho.

For the rest of the article, click here

This didn't want to post last time, I'll try again

I hike quite a bit during the summer, and always found this law to be a little silly. I can carry in the national forest, and just about every other hiking area in the state, but no national parks. I'm not a poacher, the gun I carry isn't really a hunting weapon. The parks claim you don't have to worry about animal attacks, but give out pamphlets on how to act when one happens. Of course there is a ranger nearby right...ha. I'm all for keeping poachers out, but let's let folks protect themselves in the park like they can everywhere else that you can hike in this state.

Norm

»

Not enough to have Captiol Forest and the rest of the state?

First, I'd like to be able to go somewhere where I don't have to worry about getting shot at by someone who eats a steady diet of fear and paranoia. Second, National Parks and Wildlife areas are places where animals should be safe from human predation (even in self defense). If you are not willing to take the risks, hike somewhere else.
»

Yeah Gug,

you're getting shot at all the time in Thurston County huh?

Check the crime stats in State and National parks. The crooks go there too.

Fear an paranoia is a bit over the top. Much like my description of those that think it won't happen to them, the Ostrich syndrome. “America passes the critical gate test. Open the gate and see where people go – in or out. This is still the country people flock to.” George Will

»

No Ostrich here

Just not willing to be ruled by fear.
»

So when some hikers hit the

for the day, and only have what they have on they aren't ruled by fear. But the hiker that leaves for a day hike and has extras in case something goes wrong they are ruled by fear?

It has nothing to do with fear, and everything to do with being prepared. If you have the gun and don't need it that is perfect. If you need it and don't have it, it could be a shitty day for you.

“America passes the critical gate test. Open the gate and see where people go – in or out. This is still the country people flock to.” George Will

»

Carrying a gun on a hike in the Olympics

is kind of like wearing a full-face helmet while you are driving your minivan across town. Now you tell me.
»

Growing up in the southern tip of the Olympics

I want to politely tell you that you are wrong. Ask me about how many times I have seen cougar in the Olympic forest, how many times I've run across people that were obviously up to no good, how many possible meth labs that I've hiked near. The Olympics are not always as calm as you make them out to be. PLUS who's living in fear here? Do you feel safer hiking in a park because of the no firearms rules? How many folks do you figure illegaly carry in the parks? I'm betting more than you think.
»

Oh yeah Norm

I can't tell yah how many times I've tripped over a meth lab in Olympic National Park. As for the cougars, stay out of their park if your alternative is to shoot them.
»

Nope, I'll just carry illegaly

Maybe you want to be a feline snack, not me.

»

Yup, us too

Mr. and Mrs. JT carry all the time everywhere.  Rainier National Park, Yosemite National Park, and even Grand Canyon National Park.  When we carry where we can legally, we are legal.  When we carry where we aren't, we aren't. 

Like Ted Nugent says, the 2nd amendment is our carry permit.

 

“America passes the critical gate test. Open the gate and see where people go – in or out. This is still the country people flock to.” George Will

»

I love kitty cats...

So soft and furry and friendly.  Oh my what big teeth that cougar has....  But the government will protect me.  The nice rangers are only a few dozen miles away.  I don't want to hurt the poor dear, maybe they can just tranquilize it and take it somewhere else...  Oh my, is that my leg that is bleeding?  Preservation of human life trumps nearly everything else.  
»

That's why we have national parks and refuges

They provide a little space for a few animals to be themselves without worring about getting shot.
»

Without worry of being hunted

not shot. And that isn't the only reason. Considering some of the parks in this state have more to do with Mountains than they do animals, I'm thinking it's not just a wildlife preserve.

»

Arraaggg

Carrying guns in parks isn't about hunting, or target shooting.  It is partially about self protection and partially about creating uniform guidlines for carrying AND transporting guns through national parks and refuges.   I can't go into the Klondike Gold Rush musuem in Seattle if I am carrying because it is a National Park...  
»

aragog

as I was flipping through I thought the subject of your comment was "Aragog":

»

I don't think guns would work

You'd need a good wand for that monster. I don't know how Harry and Ron made it out of there.
»

Hmmm...willful disobedience of the law....

Where have I heard of that concept before?

Last time I checked - Ted was a semi-retired rock star (I think he loves the camera magnet that gun issues make), not a law maker or law enforcement officer.

I'll take my driving lessons and directions from Stevie Wonder.

»

And if searched and arrested by Park Law Enforcement

does the 4th Amendment start coming into play?

»

Our behavior has to rise to the

level of a "Terry stop" (Security Six can explain) for them to be justified in searching us. If they search without consent, and don't have enough to justify the search, they loose the whole thing anyway.

If you don't walk like a duck, quack like a duck, and poop like a duck you probably aren't a duck. So you won't get any unwanted attention from the Rangers/cops.

“America passes the critical gate test. Open the gate and see where people go – in or out. This is still the country people flock to.” George Will

»

Don't get me started on asking

what right the Republican administration had for "searching" the webfiles of the Democratic Party and Ted Kennedy.

Ooops...too late, I'm already started.  Inadvertent hijack taking place.

»

wow,

You must have been killed like 7 or 8 times by now!

image
»

I'm faster than that

Find someone that lives near that area, and ask them how many cougar sightings they've had, or trailers in the middle of nowhere, it's not an uncommon occurence. Thanks for the smart-ass response though.

»

Cougars sited in Scott Lake and at Black Lake

While I've been living on both.  Now, I'm not thrilled at the thought of someone shooting in a high density population area, especially since Scott Lake's community is a no shooting zone (remember, we are going to follow laws and be responsible....we agreed)

According to people I've spoken with about cougars (other than the ones that seem to piss off Huskies), they have a tendency to follow deer, as their favorite Banquet Cougar Sized Dinner is fawn venison.  We have a small herd of deer that enjoy our apple trees and golf course and the buck is lame.  I think Cougar was hunting.  Balance of nature.

I chased off a huge eagle last spring, that was trying to kill a duckling for breakfast in the pond on the golf course.  He was not happy with me.  Again, balance of nature.

I would be inclined to give old Cougar a nice blast of an air horn to.....uh.....detract his interest.

By the way, when hiking, air horns and bells are excellent for steering wildlife away from you.

»

I'll provide the anecdote,

I'll provide the anecdote, you can find the stats.

There's more where that came from.

»

Merwyn

this is about parks, not national forest land.
»

Are you telling me parks are

Are you telling me parks are safer than forests? Or that one has nothing to do with the other? ONF practically surrounds ONP by the way, and last I checked there wasn't so much as a barbed-wire fence at the border.

»

Some more articles.

Here 

and here

“America passes the critical gate test. Open the gate and see where people go – in or out. This is still the country people flock to.” George Will

»

Okay guys. I'll change my

Okay guys. I'll change my list of 10 essencials.
»

Nothing drastic is

Nothing drastic is necessary. Everytime I go hiking I just spray Coug B Gone and to this day I've never been eaten. I also pray to the Virgin Mary that I won't be trampled by wild horses, so far it works great.
»

It is more about

Having the National Parks be in line with other federal lands.  I cannot drive through a national park with my loaded handgun even if just passing through.  I have no problems with hikers or other people carrying a gun while using the parks.  The parks can limit discharging firearms as well.  Just becaue guns are allowed in the parks, doesn't mean there will be ranges setup or target practice taking place.  This will make it easier for law abiding citizens to travel.  
»

I 100% support

the right to carry firearms when in the wilderness areas. In fact, I would really prefer a mandatory open carry for all firearms in these areas.

Safety, to me, is a relative term.  The stupid people in the wilderness are probably as dangerous with a beer bottle and a car as they are with a gun.

I think back to an earlier thread - recipe for disaster:  Take one stupid person, add gun and ammo, shake mildly and you have a stupid gun owner that is dangerous

»

A slight sidebar

If any of you have ever been to Olympic Game Farm in Sequim, you know that it is a drive through exhibit.  Many years ago, the former Mrs. Larry, sons Erik and Jason, my good friend Gary (whom you all knew by now) and myself are driving through and enjoy the scenery. 

We came up to the grizzly bear exhibit and sure as heck, there were three right next to the electric fence.  We owned a GMC camper van so we opened the rolling side door for Gary and the boys to get a good look and take pictures.  The woman formerly known as Mrs Larry was nervous saying that she was....uh....in season... and knew that grizzlies would attack women during their menstrual cycle.  Thus we began to drive away.

All of a sudden, this huge grizzly stood up on its back paws.......and WAVED BYE-BYE

A little further down the road, I stopped and asked Gary to hand me the camera to get a picture of the loose buffalo.  By the time I turned back, he had his head in my window.

I now know the meaning of "buffalo breath".

»

Since you asked....

Certain men here have expressed interest in the feminine perspective on guns, so here's mine.

Some have called me a liberal feminist chick, but I would not feel safe camping or hiking in any of the forests on this side of the Cascades w/o a gun.  We're just too close to large population centers over here, and the possibility of encountering human "wildlife" is a real concern for me as a woman who's never been able to scare anybody. 

I grew up in eastern wash., and I remember camping many times w/ my family mostly in northeastern OR where there were no developed campgrounds and no other folks around to encounter.  My parents and their friends brought guns along, and they would attach paper plates to pine trees to use as targets, and we all took turns shooting w/ whatever guns they brought.  So, having guns along was for recreation more than protection.  But, I've never been anyplace in western wash. that you didn't have to share the woods w/ other people, and sometimes they've been kinda different, shall we say?

I've never shot an animal, and I hope I never have to.  Feel the same way about people.  I know cats pretty well, and I think A Larry's idea about the air horn would work well w/ them  and bears, and it would be a lot less messy. 

The idea I was raised with regarding guns is that nobody needs to know what you've got unless and until you're ready to use it.  And if it comes to that, you'd better be damn sure of what you're doing.

»

Thanks,

It's nice to hear a woman's perspective that's pro-gun. I knew you were out there. I live with one, raised 2 and shoot with hundreds. Thanks for speaking up on Olyblog.

“America passes the critical gate test. Open the gate and see where people go – in or out. This is still the country people flock to.” George Will

»

Yeah

what he said :)
»

My pleasure, gentlemen, but

My pleasure, gentlemen, but I'm not sure that I can be characterized as "pro gun", though I'm certainly not anti-gun, as long as we're not talking about automatic high-powered rifles, armor piercing bullets, etc. A regular gun is just something you have, like insurance.  Or a tool, if you're a hunter.

I was not aware of the law against having one in a national park, and I know for sure my dad was in violation some years back when we had a big family campout on the east side of Mt Rainier, and a bear interrupted our evening around the campfire. Oh well.

This is not a law I would worry about, because probably nobody, park rangers included, who saw me would think I was carrying. Sometimes it's good not to look like you're doing what you're doing.  As long as we're discretely minding our own business and not bothering anyone else, what difference does it make?

»

As long as we're discretely

As long as we're discretely minding our own business and not bothering anyone else, what difference does it make?

Absolutely

»

Although I support carrying in National Parks and such

you must admit that violating a law that you are aware of is not much different that civil disodedience.

Wouldn't the prudent answer to be "get the law changed"?  Isn't that what we told the protestors?

For consistancy sake, I'd suggest that no one consciously violate a law.

Yes, I do not speed.  I own cruise control on both of my cars and I know that speeding doesn't really get you from point A to point B much faster than just driving the speed limit or the flow of traffic.

»

I'd suggest that no one consciously violate a law.

but we all do Larry, likely every day. I understand your point, and for the most part I agree, but not completely.

As far as the comparison to the port, how did my carrying concealed in Nat'l Parks affect anyone else?

“America passes the critical gate test. Open the gate and see where people go – in or out. This is still the country people flock to.” George Will

»

I suppose the difference

I suppose the difference then rides on whether you'd be screaming about your civil rights if you were caught red-handed armed in the park.

Yorn desh born, der ritt de gitt der gue
Orn desh, dee born desh, de umn børk! børk! børk!

The Swedish Chef

»

Good question

Sorry to answer a question with questions, but:

Is there a possible danger to anyone in the park?

Was the "effect" on others at the protest "dangerous"  (remember, we're speaking civil disobedience, not vandalism or rock throwing)

»

You're correct in making the

You're correct in making the comparison to civil disobedience. Getting the law changed would be the ideal situation, but that involves politics, and we know that common sense and timeliness do not always prevail there. So, in the meantime, some of us will be flying under the radar.

And, that applies to the speeding thing, too.  Some of us have a need for speed, and having the landscape flying by at a good clip, and not having to look at the back end of another vehicle helps keep us focused and awake.  Though I never drive faster than conditions allow :).

»

No,

if I get caught, it's the cost of doing business. Just like when I rode my sportbike at speeds deep into triple digits for long periods of time, if I got caught, chaulk it up to the hobby.

“America passes the critical gate test. Open the gate and see where people go – in or out. This is still the country people flock to.” George Will

»

Great example

doesn't your "hobby" now become a threat to others?

»

Well,

I'm guessing you mean my now defunct hobby, sportbikes? Only if I'm reckless, and contrary to what some cops will tell you speed alone is not reckless.

“America passes the critical gate test. Open the gate and see where people go – in or out. This is still the country people flock to.” George Will

»

Thank you.

I'm so glad to hear you say that. I grew up around racetracks and my dad (who raced cars) taught me about driving, especially at high speeds. I speed a lot, I don't like speed limits at all, well I'm really just talking about the freeway here, but I usually keep it between 80-85 in my van on the freeway (I know where the traps are usually set up and slow down for those). Anyhow, I get flack for driving so fast and people say it's reckless. I try to explain that if you know what you're doing and not playing games with other cars, then it's just a way to get to point B faster, and fun too.

image
»

Well....

I guess I'm assuming that triple digit speed is not being done on logging roads (which are traveled by others, also) or trails (which are used by foot traffic), thus you are using the same piece of road that others are driving at normal rates of speed, which in turn IS wreckless.

Check into the number of serious accidents in the dunes area of Oregon on ATVs and such, due strictly to unreasonable rates of speed, thus lack of control.

I have a friend that lives in constant pain, has lost his ability to work, much less function, due to an accident there.

»

Don't want to hijack

Norm's post here, so if we are going to debate this we should start a new thread. But I don't see much point in debating. You won't change my mind, nor me yours. I will say that as long as you take traffic and conditions into account you can drive at elevated speeds safely.

I was never one to weave in and out of heavy traffic, etc. Also if I was deep in triple digits and approached another vehicle, I didn't fly by them I slowed down, went completely by them at a reasonable speed and then slowly dialed it on.

My father is 72 years old and still rides a Hayabusa like it was designed to be ridden. So I guess I come by it naturally. Also, no collisions for either of us.

Can things go wrong, yes. But most if not all the risk was mine to bear.

That is history now though. I'm guessing I won't be able to break 65 mph on the Hardknock Kikker 5150, so don't worry I won't suck your headlights out when I pass you!!

“America passes the critical gate test. Open the gate and see where people go – in or out. This is still the country people flock to.” George Will

»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Now playing at:

Get Firefox!


More Flickr photos tagged with "olympia" and "washington"

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter