|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 10 users and 53 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
Upcoming events
Favorite Olympia Blogs Bread and Roses of Olympia The Canaanite's Call Clubside Breakfast Time decorabilia Dark Woods Casino Party E. Side Neighborhood Assoc. Flummel, Flummer, Flummo In the Course of Events John G Bell's Blog Jon's Random Acts of Geekery judimendoza Last Word Blog Nafblog No Talking Heads Olympia Dumpster Divers Olympia Time One Pissed-Off Veteran Papa November Peregrinate Pirate Papa Plan B Olympia The Raccoon Arts Collective The Rambling Taoist Trees and Water Word on the Street What This Town Needs Yelley's Photo Blog Oly Public Bloglines |
Submitted by Rick on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 6:53am.
NEWS RELEASE -- Released jointly by the City of Olympia, Port of Olympia, Thurston County, LOTT Alliance, and Washington State University Thurston County Extension: Olympia, WA. By mid-April, five agencies are expected to formalize an agreement to work as partners to develop an action plan for Budd Inlet restoration. The agencies are: the City of Olympia, Port of Olympia, Thurston County, LOTT Alliance, and Washington State University Thurston County Extension. The consortium grew from a joint meeting held in 2007 between the Olympia City Council and the Port of Olympia Commission. “To our knowledge, we are the first consortium of Puget Sound local communities and agencies to step forward with an agreement to work together on action planning and implementation,” says Olympia City Manager Steve Hall. “We are in close contact with the Puget Sound Partnership appointed by Governor Gregoire and the State Department of Ecology.” At business meetings during April, elected officials from the local government agencies are expected to consider an interlocal agreement establishing the partnership. “The LOTT Alliance already treats wastewater to the highest level on Puget Sound,” said Mike Strub, LOTT’s Executive Director. “Helping to address other sources of pollution influencing the Inlet may be critical for ensuring LOTT can maintain its discharge capacity while we build our reclaimed water program.” Unincorporated Thurston County is comprised of 406,000 acres with a current population in excess of 135,000. Thurston County Commissioner Bob Macleod says many of those residents travel to and from the cities to work, shop and take part in other activities. “Couple that daily population movement with the fact that the drainage for the Deschutes River and many other creeks and streams crosses jurisdictional lines and you see that we all influence the health or illness of Budd Inlet. It just makes sense for county government to be closely involved in efforts to restore the inlet to its historic, pristine nature,” says Macleod. “Cooperative efforts like this are fundamental to the program development of the newly-established Puget Sound Partnership, created by Governor Christine Gregoire, charged with the task of directing the clean-up of Puget Sound.” Macleod represents Thurston County government on the Sound-wide Salmon Recovery Council, a division of the Puget Sound Partnership. WSU Extension has agreed to serve as the coordinating agency on behalf of the partners. Once the interlocal agreement is approved by each group, WSU will apply to the State Department of Ecology (DOE/Ecology) for a grant to develop the unified action plan for Budd Inlet cleanup and restoration. “The health of Puget Sound is failing and will continue to get worse if action is not taken,” says Cliff Moore, Director of the WSU Thurston County Extension. “WSU is pleased to partner with Thurston County agencies to develop an action plan for the Budd Inlet portion of Puget Sound.” If successful in obtaining an Ecology planning grant, WSU Thurston County Extension, on behalf of the consortium, intends to hire Linda Hoffman of LH Consulting along with Ross & Associates Environmental Consulting Ltd to gather known data on the health of Budd Inlet and to assist the partners in creating the action plan. The first phase will include:
Background Information:
City of Olympia
Port of Olympia
LOTT Alliance
WSU Thurston County Extension
Released By:
Contacts:
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. Contributors to OlyBlog are citizen journalists who care about their community and are tired of corporate media. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our Social Contract. You should also look at our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Olyblogger of the Month: Docents are fellow citizen journalists who volunteer to be at your service in order to help with any blog-related issues. They are: Rob RichardsInterests: community building; participatory art, democracy and economics; local politics; citizen journalism. emmettoconnell Interests: City Council, developing a local issues forum. enpen Interests: OlyBlog poster calendar, Olympia public art, local artist interviews, his family, poetry and stuff. Robert Whitlock Interests: peace, justice, nature, nonviolence, media, environment Rick Interests: citizen journalism, hyperlocal media, the knowledge commons. Docent email list Latest Classified Ads Books & Collections ›Blog Local |
Priorities in common need work.
Submitted by Steven Drew on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 11:31am.Still, the City of Olympia, the Port of Olympia,Thurston County and DNR(noticably missing from the partnership)must come together with an action plan aimed at removing or replacing all of their toxic pilings with clean cement pilings. The city and port own 100's located in Budd Inlet.
So much of what needs doing is not visible to the public. How can a partnership overcome this fact when its members do not acknowledge their own highly visible toxic structures and when no plan exists for their removal?
The city for instance has a plan for upgrading its boardwalk but intends to leave over 100 toxic pilings in place. The Port has some sort of plan but is stalled by fear that if derelict toxic piles are removed prior to when new cement pilings are installed that new permitting will be highly expensive and lack certainty.
Toxic pilings are an issue
Submitted by security_six on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 1:13pm.And an expensive one. Swantown still has some old pilings, as do all of the other marina's in town. It is horribly expensive to replace pilings at a working marina. I would like to see some sort of government aid to help local governments and business replace the toxic pilings.
Are there any studies that show the damage the old style pilings do to the enviroment? I know when it gets warm enough, the tar will flow down the pilings and there will be small oil slicks around each one.
"Those who fail an attempt destroy me have made a serious tactical error."DOE has studies. DNR has money for removal.
Submitted by Steven Drew on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 4:46pm.There are a lot of old
Submitted by security_six on Wed, 04/02/2008 - 5:25pm.pilings crumbling into the water along west bay drive as well, the old plywood mill, etc... some of those are pretty rotten. Plus there are the ones near the marine terminal.
"Those who fail an attempt destroy me have made a serious tactical error."