Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Tue, 04/15/2008 - 8:09am.
I'll never forget how Sound to Harbor Head Start/ECEAP nearly lost a grant that allowed more children to be taken into the program because the illegal street-blockers jeopardized the paperwork being delivered on time.Let's see, bongo drums at the intersection of Cooper Point and Black Lake, or children (and their families) below the poverty line getting food, education and health services - it's not a tough choice to make at all.
"Never forget?"
Submitted by Guglielmo on Tue, 04/15/2008 - 9:29am.
Man, that is one traumatic, nearly delayed papers delivery!Submitted by Merwyn Haskett on Tue, 04/15/2008 - 9:49am.
I'll mention this once then drop it from this thread: you're mocking children aged 3 and 4, many of them from Migrant Families, who are below the poverty line. They are not eating, they are not getting basic health care, many aren't even learning basic social and living skills. Often they come from single-parent families who grew up in the same situation. Many of these children belong to the same workers that the celebrants say they're standing in solidarity for.The grant wasn't for me to get a raise, or for the office to get remodelled. It was for more teachers, supplies and class space so that we could accept more children into the program. This was especially important that year as we became responsible for Grays Harbor County as well.
A common misconception is that Head Start's a private school for rich kids. It's not, you have to be below the poverty line to qualify (as of 2001)
I'm mocking kids?
Submitted by Guglielmo on Tue, 04/15/2008 - 9:58am.
No Merwyn. I'm quite familiar with Head Start and know it is a very worthwhile publicly funded program for children. Very valuable indeed. I was mocking your "I'll never forget" take on the affair, and your suggestion that the intellectual calculus of those blocking the intersection included a consideration of two options: block the street or care about poor children. It's a pretty farfetched and unfair dichotomy. If I almost run over a child on my way to work, did I choose driving to work over a child's safety when I left my garage? Apparently so.
As I explained to someone else in a PM, had the streets been jammed because everyone was driving at the same time that'd be tough luck. But on that particular year they were blocked because people wanted to deliberately block them. Television sets were smashed in the intersection to insure cars would have a difficult time making it through. Key word here is "deliberate".
I agree that probably nobody there had the possibility of Head Start Grants on their mind - I'll bet they cared equally little for emergency vehicles.
I'm not Anti May Day - in fact I like it. Everytime I learn something new concerning Labor history I'm fascinated. As a former Wal-Mart slave I know full well that Worker Solidarity and Education is still a very real necessity. But just like with Critical Mass if a group intentionally disrupts the average person they're going to lose out on getting their message heard and accepted.
I realize that not every May Day in the last decade has been that bad - which I appreciate. I hope this years is inclusive instead of antagonistic.
Comments
To quote Steve Hall
Yup. Steve "sore eye" Hall Said in regards to that specific Mayday "Cars get the road 364 days a year. Let those kids have it for a few hours"
I don't want to bitter this thread, and I just deleted what might have been a bitter post.
I want to suggest that instead of taking issue with whether or not people are sitting in a road, take issue with why. It seems the act of sitting in the road is what bothers you. Maybe you'd feel better about it if you had a better understanding of why someone would do such a thing.
And if Steve Hall gave them
Do the Mayday participants want to be inclusive and perhaps educate people over to their side, or do they want to be defiant, antagonist and turn off people?
I wouldn't mind being around the activity - perhaps there would be a speaker I'd like to hear, perhaps there would be performances I'd enjoy, perhaps I'll learn something new on a subject that I really am a fan of - but try to look at it from John Common's perspective: Would I be more likely to check out a legal permitted event, or would I be more likely to step into illegal activity and possibly get in the way of a response team?
I took part in a Stormans protest once: All of us stayed out of the road and off private property - not only passing traffic but also the shoppers were able to move along without even having to pause while a crowd parted - it was an enjoyable day and the police didn't have to get their sticks out.
Lakefair deliberately stops traffic
See above, I think we're
I'll be sure to play Joe Hill and 1913 Massacre on the air soon - also, an awesome song by David Rovics called Minimum Wage Strike.