|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 6 users and 34 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by Sarah on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 8:13am.
Yes, controlling, much. The Olympian has another editorial today about Neo-Nazis in which they counsel "Simply ignore them.". In the comments thread we are told "Anyone who shows up at the Nazis gathering - for ANY REASON - is doing their bidding. Period. People who monitor hate groups disagree.
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
Nazis come to OlyWa: A history (so far) |
I hate to say it, but I agree
Submitted by white feather on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 8:38am.They want recruits. This is a
Submitted by Sarah on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 8:47am.How would we make sure no one responds? Imagine back on 1/22 here in Olympia, what if no one responded? Sounds lovely, the NSM packs up their toys and leaves? But what about the family getting off the bus nearby who have to cope with what they see in front of them, who realize that no one in town apparently gives a damn about their safety?
Why isn't a diverse array of responses and strategies seen as a -good- thing instead of as something messy/bad and to be controlled? Also, why are targets blamed for somehow causing Nazis to keep on nazi-ing?
Silence is some sort of luxury that many of us just don't have.
(I put this in the wrong place in thread, supposed to be reply to white feather.)
From what I heard the Nazi's
Submitted by white feather on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:03am.The "other side", I call hippies, have singlehandedly given this group a reason to come back. We could have ignored them the first time and would have had a 50/50 chance of that being the one event. Now, they have a reason to come back. And many on this blog keep "poking the dog". Now it's likely they will get people from their group to come from all over the nation, and maybe with some real bad asses in the group. If we end up with a big group here and lots of violence, the hippies have ownership in that violence.
There may be a lot of education on this blog, but not much common sense.
So all of us who responded to
Submitted by Sarah on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:24am.Hippies = bad
These bad hippies are the reason why Neo-Nazis will return to Olympia.
In fact, the variety of voices here on this local blog will also cause the Nazis to be violent.
So, should we eradicate hippies? Should we pass a law that prevents a variety of voices from expression on a blog such as this?
Such power these hippies have, they singlehandedly give motivation and hope to the lonely attention starved Nazis.
But wait a moment. Right now, I feel as if I am talking with a calm Jim Ramm. Because a whole helluva lotta assumptions are being made. The messengers and targets are being blamed for the behavior of bullies. Labels are being tossed around. Scapegoats are being lined up in advance.
You seem agitated Sarah. I ha
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:43am.The real battle against hate is in the home and in the school.
The golden rule still applies here. Just because the nazi's are severely lacking in moral and ethical principles doesn't give us the go-ahead to hate on them.
Rob, I'm not sure what to do
Submitted by Sarah on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:50am.I think this whole thing is a
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:54am.[edit] And honestly, yes it bothers me. It also bothers me how much energy these guys have garnered. I think their attention is undeserved.
Please compare their actions to those of an Internet "Troll."
What do you think of that?
Rob, really, did I ask you fo
Submitted by Sarah on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 10:03am.Most any activity can become obsessive. Many individuals and groups monitor hate groups in a healthy fashion. Because the material we deal with is intense and traumatic, we naturally have to take good care of ourselves and each other. I myself am doing fine.
I'd rather we look at the themes we are discussing rather than on what we think of the writer, I need to remember this myself also. Play the ball, not the man.
It would be nice if you had s
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:41am.If you would like to see some "hippies" up close and personal, you can come over to dinner at my house. You can meet me, my family, and I'll introduce you to a few of my friends. You might have a different opinion by the end of the evening. If you choose not to accept my invitation, please refrain from the name calling.
If this is indeed a Jim Ramm
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:47am.Counterdemonstration does not
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:51am.Intention is one thing, reali
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:56am.My point is simply that directly counterprotesting them may not be the most effect or assertive activity.
So we agree on one thing: you
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 10:03am.Jim Ramm also counsels people
Submitted by Sarah on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:55am.Does the fact that a Nazi enjoys what he is doing mean I and others should not stand up as another voice? Should we all go quiet while the Nazis enjoy themselves?
I don't see this as an either-or proposition. Either stay home and quiet or show up and get baited into acting out and be jailed. There really is a whole range of possibilities and strategies.
That's why I am listening to
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:58am.If my hippie label has offend
Submitted by white feather on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 10:22am.I just hope this community doesn't feel a much bigger pain from these Nazi's, because of the counter-group (there, no hippie label). I personally believe the community should have ignored them. If they continued and amped up, then the community could respond in force. But when you go 0-100 out of the gate, it plays into their hand, and leaves little room to amp up if they do. And I hate that the reaction of some have essentially empowered them.
I appreciate what you have to
Submitted by Rick on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 10:34am.I appreciate what you have to say. All language is about how you use it, and I also think of "hippie" as a positive term. It depends on the way it is used however, and I was hearing a lot of discounting in what you said. Thanks for clarifying.
I think that we're not locked into a conventional response, however. As Sarah said, there are lots of possible responses. I believe that this community could respond in a creative manner that would leave the Nazis dazed and confused, while at the same time transforming the whole event from one of hate and confrontation to one of humor and solidarity.
I hope you and Sarah are corr
Submitted by white feather on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 11:08am.I'm surprised at how relaxed
Submitted by TheMadHousewife on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 11:48am.I notice that much of the adv
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 12:53pm.As someone who has read extensively the history of Nazi camps in the 1930's and 1940's, I assert that their message is anything BUT neutral. I might have a right to political free speech, but I don't have the right to shout "fire" in a crowded theatre. I argue that shouting "6 Billion More" on the streets of Olympia is less political speech than hate speech. It's like shouting "kike" in a synagogue, or shouting "nigger" in a Baptist Church. You can say all you want about the NSM following the law, but if I went around talking in graphic terms about killing the Bush Administration, I'd have an interview with a Secret Service agent really soon. When the NSM says they would kill a man (in my presence) for being gay, that is not neutral. That is assault. It happened within earshot of several police officers, who did nothing to confront it - because they were sorely outnumbered and needed to keep as much order as they could.
The same could be said of the other side; I heard more than one shout of "death to the Nazis." I heard several people shouting things which would embarass me, if I had said them. One man shouted "pussies! pussies!" over and over at the Nazis. The definition of clueless, in a town which invented the image of the Riot Grrrl...
The request to ignore them is not going to be accepted by many of us. Someone is going to be confronting them, and that confrontation is likely to be hateful. But we _should_ hate the Nazis' politics - it is the politics of factories eating surplus workers, literally starving them to death while extracting the last of their labor from them at the same time. It is not just white "pride." It is not a mirror version of black nationalism. It is a genocidal impulse, explicitly stated.
Our tactics, even after all of this, should be to silently shadow their movements, and use our voices to sing or ridicule them rather than shout assaults. But we should NOT be absent from their venue, if we have any notion that they will be somewhere. They have to be challenged. They are the trial balloon for what the Bush Admin wants to do with those camps you heard about in the news recently. We already have a prison population - per capita - larger than Nazi Germany in 1944-45. Larger than the USSR ever. Larger than China now. Largest in Human History. And we have camps, too - labor camps, for first time nonviolent drug offenders and 'troubled youth.' The camps in Germany started much the same way, for exacly the same reasons. We are already closer to being the Third Reich in this country than most are willing to admit.
Drew: I notice that much o
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 1:15pm.Where specifically did you notice this? I think you're mis-understanding here, Drew.
Their message is repugnant and vile. I think I have made my opinion 100% clear in my communication about this issue.
The issues for me here is whether "we" get sidetracked from other important work, into a hyped up, (possibly obsessive) response to "them." The other issue is whether our response somehow benefits them - either by lending them credibility or by somehow empowering them or by getting them increased media attention from the confrontational display.
And in terms of recruitment, perhaps some racist sympathizers will be rallied to their sides, when they see their white supremacist buddies being "threatened" by "lefties."
Has anyone thought about that? Confrontation leads to greater media hype, which leads to sympathetic racists coming to the aid of the NSM'ers. I think that it's something to think about.
Sorry, but you seem to have t
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 2:45pm.Your fellow progressives will decide for themselves whether to consider confrontation to be "sidetracking." We each set our own priorities, as it should be. Many if not most of us will be working on anti-racist community building anyway, so you'd be better served to focus on that rather than hammering on those of us who WILL confront the Nazis. Many different tactics will be tried - we have to allow them the space to coexist, and evaluate what works and what does not work, from direct experience. I might add that we have many disagreements about what actually happened, as well. If we want to make progress here, we could discuss just what we think happened on January 22nd.
It would help me accept your arguments if you could drop the language in which you evaluate the mental health of your fellow progressives. To say that anyone is being 'obsessive' is marginalizing and unfair, given that you are not a doctor... stick to the ideas, don't evaluate our motives or mental health in terms of your own values.
Have any of us thought about nonconfrontation? Sure - but we have come down on the other side of the issue, Rob. I wonder why it is that you have not felt heard on this... you've made and made and made your point, in writing, in several forums. We do not agree with nonconfrontation. We are serving our values in the way which we feel is correct, and we lodge responsibility for the NSM's actions where it belongs - with them. We are no more responsible for their actions than you are responsible for ours.
Closer to the Third Reich tha
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 1:35pm.Drew, although I disagreed wi
Submitted by white feather on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 1:23pm.Mad Housewife, the Nazi's don't need to come to town to get your kids. All they need is MIA parents, crappy home life, lack of supervision, the internet, the TV, the radio, and they have them. The same way gangs get your kids, the same way, druggies get your kids, the same way pedophiles get your kids. Yes I agree it is better if the Nazi's don't come here. We had a few wimpy, low level Nazi's come visit, we overreacted, and now we may get the heavy hitters. And they may be here longer, with more time to make contact with the kids who are adrift. I believe the hippies hearts were in the right place, but I really believe it was a tactical error to engage the little group like they did. Time will tell.
I've studied the forfeiture l
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 3:02pm.Time does not allow me to go into great length, but I could suggest you visit this review of a book on the subject for example. I have not read this book, but I wrote a couple of papers with the same thesis when I was in college.
"VERY parallel to Nazi German
Submitted by white feather on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 3:26pm.You know what they say about opinions, Drew. I think your doing a little 1+2 and coming up with 15.
Well college boy, The Fire, what say you on Drew's assessment?
I think it's a stretch, which
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 4:44pm.I assume Drew is against the government seizure of private property for drug offenses. I agree with him and even take it a step further, wondering why government has been allowed to strip away a guarantee (the Second Amendment) for domestic violence convictions?
This would be like telling someone they have surrendered their First Amendment guarantees because they have been found guilty of perjury.
So if there's an argument about government growing too big, that's valid. Does it resemble the Third Reich? If you wanted to really believe it, I can see how one could convince themselves.
The reason I don't agree with it, though, is because when such a statement is made one is implying we are an evil country. There are about a gagillion other examples one could give which are more accurate and far less inflammatory.
For instance, Drew cited the number of people we currently have in incarceration. The examples of a lower population were Nazi Germany, the USSR, and today's China. By using these examples, a reader would assume people in US prisons are there because of similar tactics (re: corrupt judicial system).
But does anyone really here think that the American judicial system is corrupt? I mean, even if you believe that the system is inherently unfair, the step to judicial corruption is quite a case to make.
Long story short, you have to look at why and how, not just the end result.
I can't help but be reminded
Submitted by Rob Richards on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 5:12pm.white feather: I'm trying to
Submitted by Rob Richards on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 4:49pm.(You also did this thing where you dismissed his opinion and then state your opinion expecting to be heard, and taken seriously. As soon as you write somebody off like that, communication stops, because nobody wants to listen to someone who's not listening them.)
I think people are only going
Submitted by The Fire Inside on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 5:00pm.The first article in Foreign Affairs for January/February is "Failing the Stalin Test." In it the authors describe how over half (56 percent) of Russians describe Stalin as "having done more good than bad." Hell, 30 percent of Russians 30 and over said they would "definately or probably" vote for Stalin if he ran in an election today.
So really it shouldn't come as a surprise that some might consider the US to be "very parallel" to Nazi Germany.
I think it's a wreckless comparison but that's just me.
I don't think any comparison
Submitted by Rob Richards on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 5:23pm.Rob, I'm guessing you are
Submitted by white feather on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 5:46pm.I'm guessing you are talking about my comment about "you know what they say about opinions". That was an attempt at humor and I see why that was not the best attempt after re-reading it. It would be nice to have some emotioncons to convey that better here.
I still believe Drew took 1+2 and got 15 with his analysis. Fire said it more elloquently than me though.
i didn't mean to seem judgmen
Submitted by Rob Richards on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 6:27pm.Rob, parallel is parallel.
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:09pm.It just is.
There is no sort of parallel. It either is or isn't.
Although train tracks may app
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:59pm.It's sort of like saying, "Th
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 10:01pm.food for thought. I'm smiling too.
I understand your point. H
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sat, 03/04/2006 - 12:41am.However, I am not a literalist. I don't believe that everything a person says should be taken word for word. I don't think, based on my interpretation of what Drew wrote, that he meant things are as bad now as they were under Hitler. What I got from it was that there are identifiable patterns in the two which lead Drew to the conclusion that we need to be paying attention to what's going on right now, because if we don't, we're heading toward a bad situation.
I'm not going to say that Bush is Hitler, but I will say that he's got some Hitler tendencies.
No problem, like I said when
Submitted by white feather on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 6:52pm.But with that said, I can have passion on certain topics, and hopefully that style won't cause a problem. Nothing has hit my passion spot yet, but when it does hold on. :)
It is probably a miracle that
Submitted by Sarah on Fri, 03/03/2006 - 9:22pm.As for passion, I hear you on that. Folks who read Oly Blog have probably figured out what one of my passions are by now.
Here is (in their own words)
Submitted by DrewHendricks on Wed, 03/15/2006 - 2:00pm.