|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 12 users and 51 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by olyrickm on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 9:15pm.
This is from an article on Salon.com. Reading it made me wonder why there is such urgency in some quarters to have a parking garage downtown. Would a parking garage give back to the community the land that is used for parking lots? "In cities, the parking lots themselves are black holes in the urban fabric, making city streets less walkable. One landscape architect compares them to "cavities" in the cityscape. Downtown Albuquerque, N.M., now devotes more land to parking than all other land uses combined. Half of downtown Buffalo, N.Y., is devoted to parking. And one study of Olympia, Wash., found that parking and driveways occupied twice as much land as the buildings that they served."
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|
if...
Submitted by noradarno on Sun, 09/30/2007 - 9:32pm.A Diamond in the Rough
Submitted by Ehver Green on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 1:19pm.I know many here won't agree with using the term rough. In context I think it makes sense. What I do like about these suggestions - they aren't trying to specify the need for certain types of business or a reduction or current business types.
Fourth Avenue 'a diamond in the rough' - The Study by Ambia
I especially like the following:
• Reduce Fourth Avenue from three lanes to two between Jefferson and Chestnut to make the street more like a narrow city street than a wide suburban one. One traffic lane would be replaced with angled parking. EG: If this does become city hall, angled parking in front of the building would be great but I'd prefer to see it inside the lot, not on the edge of a traffic lane.
• Replace parking lots with mixed-use retail, office and housing. EG: A couple of public restroom/wash areas would be nice for walking traffic.
• Bring the artesian well, now in a parking lot near Fourth and Jefferson, out to the sidewalk. EG: Give it an artist rendered facade and ensconse the hardware.
The pictures from the Ambia link are really good at showing where focus of the 4th Ave corridor turns wide and metropolitan like (Olympic Outfitters is a great example). Textured crosswalks would be a nice touch.
I can't help but see the similarities between the Ambia plan and the downtown of Boise, ID.
I believe it
Submitted by chaney on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 10:41am.My (least) favorite example is the bike lane on Black Lake Blvd., which goes about a block from the entrance of Ken Lake, where I live, and then disappears as you're going through the free way entrance/exit. It stops right as it passes the exit that heads toward the mall, so if you've gone under the overpass in the lane, you're going to need to negotiate a line of cars coming off the freeway while you're merging into traffic. And the road you're merging into, like the other arteries, is pretty much off-limits for cyclists who aren't in good enough form to keep up a high speed, which isn't very cool if you're rehabbing a knee injury, like I was. And then if you're biking on the sidewalk, there are the parking lot exits, where cars routinely pull out into the path of the sidewalk and stare to their left for a gap in traffic. So if you're coming from the right... Well, you can tap on their window, but they'll just roll it down and call you an asshole. I could go on.
And that's to say nothing of the impact on our streams, our Sound, our groundwater...
Our response so far has been to keep expanding outward and building on wooded lots... What we should be doing is tearing up the parking lots and building on top of them. I'm kind of shocked more people aren't replying to this thread. Sprawl is the #1 issue in Olympia if you ask me...
So you think we should just
Submitted by Norm on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 1:21pm.I'm not sure how you got that from my post
Submitted by chaney on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 1:55pm.What we should be doing is
Submitted by Norm on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 1:59pm.What we should be doing is tearing up the parking lots and building on top of them
That seems to be what you are/were saying....in a nutshell. I'm not badmouthing you, was just curious. I thought maybe you had more input on the subject. Personally I'd be afraid of earthquakes, but if the flood is coming maybe higher is better?
No need to worry about
Submitted by Rob Richards on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 2:05pm.We should build new buildings on higher ground, not in the middle of a flood plain, like the potential locations for the new city hall.
So we should all move to
Submitted by Norm on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 2:18pm.more art
Submitted by enpen on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 2:26pm.We should commission local sculpture artists to create street side sculptures capable of floating. After the water rises people could get through downtown like the Mario Bros., or something.
Hmm
Submitted by chaney on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 2:35pm.you don't have to move that
Submitted by Rob Richards on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 3:54pm.Well
Submitted by chaney on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 2:25pm.Earthquakes are a threat, sure, but so is environmental degradation. You can't stop plate tectonics, but you can stop polluted water from running straight into Puget Sound...
I like to have a place to park.
Submitted by Scott Haley on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 7:33pm.Build up, but about 7
Submitted by Rob Richards on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 1:24pm.seriously
Submitted by enpen on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 1:35pm.And life preserver caches on every corner.
Yeah, the policy of parking lots in Olympia and elsewhere sucks
Submitted by Summerisle on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 5:49pm.It's so funny, so completely funny...I remember spending some time in Vienna about four years ago on a trip, staying close to the city center in a hostel. Looking at that city you can tell how people used to think about constructing towns in a way that's built to last, that avoids idiot quick fixes like suburbs and excessive roads through the city and parking lots. I went to a place marked as being the oldest section of the old town there, which was a square, and noticing that it was built in the 13th century. Still in use, still functioning, although not much of the original architecture remains. Most of the houses are from the 16th century.Oh, and the point is this: the construction is so dense and so thought out that beyond the historical value it beats the pants off of most medium sized downtowns in terms of efficiency.
Parking garages are more efficient
Submitted by xavier on Mon, 10/01/2007 - 8:23pm.correct me if i'm wrong...
Submitted by a.future.with.n... on Tue, 10/02/2007 - 2:39pm....but isn't mixed use buildings, as sited in the arcitects report in todays olympian, what meta hogan has been talking about for the past 3 years or so? it makes perfect sense.
if you've ever been to toronto canada, you'll notice the enitre downtown is structured around mixed income, mixed use housing with grocery and retail bottom stories. the result of this kind of city planning is a complete absense of ghettos in a highlu urban environment. it's clean, pretty, and it's easy to park just outside the city and take a bus or rail car anywhere you want to go. that didn't happen by accident. it took some serious vision.
and by the way, congratulations on freely exercising your right to choose whether or not to have an abortion xavier. i hope the point of that add-in was to encourage other people to protect and respect thier right to choose as well.
Choice indeed...
Submitted by Guglielmo on Tue, 10/02/2007 - 2:51pm.Without choice, by what measure can we be considered virtuous?
There is nothing admirable about an involuntary Saint.
Blog Watch
Submitted by Sarah on Wed, 10/03/2007 - 3:47pm.