User login

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 19 guests online.

Online users

  • JT

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • itsthewater
  • tsunamizombie
  • Brooks
  • Teresa Marie Staal
  • Jeff151

Poster Calendar

July

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Fri, 11/30/2007 - 3:36pm.

Almost every week this is the "What's on the city council's plate this week" review. I don't cover everything, so if you want the full rundown, read the packet and agenda yourself.

Instead of going up as much as we thought before, Park impact fees will be going up half as much as previously thought, if the city council takes the advice of their staff next week.

For example, when you build your average single family home in Olympia, the park impact fee is $1,843. Under the original proposal that fee would have gone up to $5,793. But, under the new plan, its only going up to $2,896.

But, I assume the council is going to increase it again sometime. So says the staff report:

Subsequent to the November 13, 2007 Study Session in which the attached impact fee rate study was presented, Councilmember Hyer proposed adopting an interim fee with an approximately 50% reduction in the rates proposed in the Rate Study. According to Councilmember Hyer, this fee would remain in effect until the next update to the Park Plan is complete and the fee schedule is further adjusted to coincide with updated target outcome ratios or other factors.

Adopting an interim fee that is approximately 50% of the total fee proposed in the rate study will mean that during the interim period the City will not collect revenue sufficient to ensure that the current ratio of park acres to population will be met. However, due to the fact that the phased-in approach proposed by Councilmember Hyer will be of a relatively short duration, it is not likely that the ratio of park acres to population will decline significantly.

Staff is suggesting that any impact fee increase go into affect on March 1, 2008 so that staff will have sufficient time to give notice to the community and to undertake the processes to administer the new rate structure.

Here are all of the proposed changes:

Single Family
Current Fee (since 1998) $1,843
Proposed Fee (Rate Study) $5,793
Proposed Interim Fee (approx. 50% Reduction) $2,896

Duplex
Current Fee (since 1998) $1,385
Proposed Fee (Rate Study) $3,503
Proposed Interim Fee (approx. 50% Reduction) $1,752

Mutifamily
Current Fee (since 1998) $1,223
Proposed Fee (Rate Study) $3,503
Proposed Interim Fee (approx. 50% Reduction) $1,752

Mobile Home
Current Fee (since 1998)$1,236
Proposed Fee (Rate Study)$3,503
Proposed Interim Fee (approx. 50% Reduction)$1,752

Accessory Dwelling Unit
Current Fee (since 1998) $707
Proposed Fee (Rate Study) $1,977
Proposed Interim Fee (approx. 50% Reduction) $990

Single Room Occupancy Unit
Current Fee (since 1998) $718
Proposed Fee (Rate Study) $1,977
Proposed Interim Fee (approx. 50% Reduction) $990

Downtown Multi-Family
Current Fee (since 1998)$840
Proposed Fee (Rate Study)$2,003
Proposed Interim Fee (approx. 50% Reduction) $1,003

Here is the staff report (beware, pdf files)
Attachment One (the ordinance)
Attachement Two (responses to councilmember Joe Hyer from the consultant)

»

I wonder why middle income

I wonder why middle income people have a hard time living in Olympia?
»

Beats me

I pay a fee to the DNR every year as part of my rent and pay registration on my boat. 

These fees are one time fees on new construction right?  They actually make sense to me, although on could and should argue the amounts.  I am so far removed from even caring about real estate issues I couldn't argue this issue.  The only land I own is some up in Alaska, and there are no taxes on it...  

Perhaps a  new home owner could have the option of paying these impact fees over a space of several years... 

»

Impact fees are paid before

Impact fees are paid before a building permit is issued. The rub that some have with then is that they are unbelievably high in Olympia and the funds are usually never spent in the area intended. For example, if a developer applies for a sub-division of 800 homes in Oly he pays nearly $15,800,000 in impact fees. That same subdivision almost anywhere else in the state would cost him about 1/4 of that. On top of that most of those funds would not go into new parks/services within that sub-division, the builder runs the lines. That being said the city has become a bit dependent upon them to fund some projects. As soon as builders stop trying to build affordable homes in Olympia the city will have to go elsewhere for money. The amount of our fees has driven builders to construct higher end homes in town and the remaining folks who can't afford them are being driven elsewhere. Some sort of fee is probably reasonable considering the high cost of services, however, as with a lot of things, our wonderful little burg is different. As you may be able to tell, this issue is close to my heart.
»

Interesting...

I'm going to study up on this some more.  It sounds rather unjust.
»

seem pretty direct

For example, if a developer applies for a sub-division of 800 homes in Oly he pays nearly $15,800,000 in impact fees. That same subdivision almost anywhere else in the state would cost him about 1/4 of that.

The elected officials were asked to attempt a control/cap of house farms, is what I'm getting. Given the fee structure they are set to encourage the development of condos if you're a developer looking to make some bucks, or a house if you're a family looking to build your dream home.

Unless we're trying to develop Olympia into a sprawling rag-tag collection of suburbs, the structure seems sound to me.

»

It may seem sound on the

It may seem sound on the surface. High density within the urban growth boundry is the goal. Although condos are great for some they just dont appreciate like a stick built single family home. Homes are the leading way a family gains wealth. Someone making a modest living can become independent using homes, not very likely with a condo. The city actually desires large sub-divisions, so do enviromentalists. It is a matter of walking the walk when people talk about affordable housing. We can talk about it all we want, we just have to look at ourselves when prices are to high.
»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. Contributors to OlyBlog are citizen journalists who care about their community and are tired of corporate media.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our Social Contract. You should also look at our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Olyblogger of the Month:

decorabilia

Sponsored by:

Docents are fellow citizen journalists who volunteer to be at your service in order to help with any blog-related issues. They are:

Rob Richards
Interests: community building; participatory art, democracy and economics; local politics; citizen journalism.

emmettoconnell
Interests: City Council, developing a local issues forum.

enpen
Interests: OlyBlog poster calendar, Olympia public art, local artist interviews, his family, poetry and stuff.

Robert Whitlock
Interests: peace, justice, nature, nonviolence, media, environment

Rick
Interests: citizen journalism, hyperlocal media, the knowledge commons.

Get Firefox!

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter