|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 6 users and 34 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 3:11pm.
Almost every week this is the "What's on the city council's plate this week" review. I don't cover everything, so if you want the full rundown, read the packet and agenda yourself. 1. Craig Ottaveli wants to change the Rules of Procedure, the ominously named rules by which the Olympia City Council lives by. I'm assuming from the minutes of the council retreat that the one he really wants to change is the "No Surprises" rule. That rule means that a councilmember has to give fellow members 48 hours warning before broaching a new topic. An infringement on conversation with the public? A violation of the open meetings act? I don't know, but the General Government committee will take it up on Tuesday at 5 p.m. 2. The city is also considering spending $50k on more thought about tall buildings near water. From the staff report:
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|
Building on the Isthmus
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 3:56pm.I would like to see a proposal to gradually return the isthmus to a natural area.
natural meaning underwater
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 3:58pm.landfill
Submitted by chad360 on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 4:42pm....where would all the landfill go that is underneath the surface of the so-called isthmus?
Olympia is so near the sea level, I wonder what will happen-
$50K huh? any front runner for the consulting gig? is there an RFP?
meaning of natural
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Fri, 02/22/2008 - 10:46pm.hmm, well you have a point there. I think the specific details would need to be hammered out by consensus if possible.
In general, I support development of open public spaces - aka parkland - on the isthmus.
I just like the idea of a natural area contrasting with a dense urban core. The tighter the juxtaposition the better. I think this notion fits in well with the city's sustainability mission.
We have to allow for ecology. We have to allow for walkability. I think walkability is a big part of sustainability. Putting those buildings up in that location would detract from the city's walkability, which in turn would detract from sustainability.
patchwork parks and tidal canals
Submitted by chad360 on Sat, 02/23/2008 - 5:38pm.Such potential...
...what I'd like to see is a patchwork of walking and working parks (working park = urban food forest) that connect across the "landfill that is downtown" so that at "street surface level" movement across town from any direction to any other direction (N-S-E-W) could be accomplished without competing for space with auto traffic.
The isthmus plays a key role and is a dynamic element of downtown...
...but at the same time it is always a reminder for me of how downtown Oly floats of filth.
I'm amazed that the springs downtown don't percolate more effluent up from the sedimentary and fill layers beneath the buildings, sidewalks, roads, and vacant lots.
Building heights
Submitted by Rob Richards on Sun, 02/24/2008 - 5:19pm.