|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 6 users and 30 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by hrstruggle on Thu, 06/19/2008 - 11:16am.
Waters gets 6 years for UW firebombing, Seattle PI "...A key to Wednesday's sentencing hearing in Tacoma was whether actions of Waters, who acted as a lookout and provided logistics support to her ELF compatriots, rose to the level of terrorism.
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|
More new information
Submitted by djmega on Thu, 06/19/2008 - 7:15pm.Here is some more new (this month) information relevant to her case from the Civil Liberties Defense Center http://www.cldc.org
"The case was built on the word of two informants, Jen Kolar and Lacey Phillabaum. Although, Ms. Waters attorneys, Robert Bloom and Neil Fox, filed a motion that the government concealed important information and created a fraudulent FBI report. The Judge Burgess denied the motion in January.
In June a Motion to Continue and be released while waiting was filed by Briana's attorneys in which they reveal that government informant and co-defendant Jennifer Kolar patently lied and deceived the feds and the jury, and an investigation is required to determine what action needs to be taken in light of the disclosure. The defense motion is based upon documents that the government disclosed pursuant to their Brady obligation. This new information has the potential to result in a mistrial.