|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 7 users and 52 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
Upcoming events
Favorite Olympia Blogs Bread and Roses of Olympia The Canaanite's Call Clubside Breakfast Time decorabilia Dark Woods Casino Party E. Side Neighborhood Assoc. Flummel, Flummer, Flummo In the Course of Events John G Bell's Blog Jon's Random Acts of Geekery judimendoza Last Word Blog Nafblog No Talking Heads Olympia Dumpster Divers Olympia Time One Pissed-Off Veteran Papa November Peregrinate Pirate Papa Plan B Olympia The Raccoon Arts Collective The Rambling Taoist Trees and Water Word on the Street What This Town Needs Yelley's Photo Blog Oly Public Bloglines |
Submitted by Rick on Wed, 12/05/2007 - 12:39am.
Preamble As members of the OlyBlog community, we acknowledge our mutual responsibility for maintaining conditions under which communication can flourish - conditions characterized by openness, honesty, civility and fairness. These conditions carry with them certain rights and responsibilities, expressed in this Social Contract, a document that will define and guide the blog's values and operation from this time forward. The Social Contract is an agreement; a guide for civility and tolerance toward others; a reminder that respecting others and remaining open to others and their ideas is an essential ingredient for successful community building. By registering for an account on OlyBlog, individuals agree to abide by this contract. The Social Contract OlyBlog is a self-organizing community that offers an alternative civic forum for the discussion of news and events in Olympia, Washington. OlyBlog can thrive only if members respect the rights of others while enjoying their own rights. Members of the community may differ widely in their specific interests, in the degree and kinds of experiences they bring to OlyBlog, and the level of involvement that they wish to undertake. All must share alike in demonstrating intellectual honesty, in responsibly obtaining and providing full and accurate information, and in resolving differences through a process with a strong will to collaboration. The individual members of the OlyBlog community are responsible for protecting each other and visitors to the blog from uncivil abuse and personal threats. Civility is not just a word; it must be present in all our interactions. Members of the community must be allowed to exercise the rights accorded them to voice their opinions with respect to basic matters of policy and other issues. The practice of communication without the benefit of face-to-face interaction poses certain unique challenges. In order to address these challenges, members of OlyBlog agree to the following practices:
As participants in the human activity of communication, we also acknowledge and value the use of humor as an important component of building a community. However, given that humor is highly subjective, there is the possibility of misunderstanding and conflict. The use of humor does not absolve an individual from their responsibility to protect other members from uncivil behavior. An essential condition for community is the freedom and right on the part of an individual or group to express minority, unpopular, or controversial points of view. Only if minority and unpopular points of view are tolerated and given opportunity for expression will OlyBlog provide bona fide opportunities for significant consciousness raising. There shall be no discrimination at OlyBlog based on race, sex, age, handicap, sexual orientation, religious or political belief, or national origin in considering individuals' membership. |
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. Contributors to OlyBlog are citizen journalists who care about their community and are tired of corporate media. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our Social Contract. You should also look at our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Olyblogger of the Month: Docents are fellow citizen journalists who volunteer to be at your service in order to help with any blog-related issues. They are: Rob RichardsInterests: community building; participatory art, democracy and economics; local politics; citizen journalism. emmettoconnell Interests: City Council, developing a local issues forum. enpen Interests: OlyBlog calendar, Oly street art, local artist interviews, his family, poetry and stuff. Robert Whitlock Interests: peace, justice, nature, nonviolence, media, environment Rick Interests: citizen journalism, hyperlocal media, the knowledge commons. Docent email list Books & Collections ›Blog Local |
Disclose any conflict of interest.
Submitted by security_six on Wed, 12/05/2007 - 9:03am.Can you elaborate on that one please? If I chime in on say a gun rights issue, do I have to say "BTW, I am an NRA member?"
Or if a person works for, or on behalf of a company, agency, or other entity, are they not to have an opinion on an issue involving that entity without first disclosing their relationship? What if they have an opinion that may not be favorable to that entity?
I think this is a sticky issue.
I also think rewriting entries should be acceptable, so long as the edit is noted, and why.
I think this arose...
Submitted by Rick on Wed, 12/05/2007 - 9:08am....from bloggers who working for campaigns out there blogging as if they were just citizens. In all ethical dilemmas, each would have to look to his/her own conscience to do the right thing -- I interpret it to mean "relevant" conflicts of interests.
> Say something interesting or say nothing at all. <
Okay
Submitted by security_six on Wed, 12/05/2007 - 9:10am.You know about why I was concerned about this one...
Your interpretation makes sense.
hmmm
Submitted by enpen on Wed, 12/05/2007 - 10:56am.Despite my previous comment agreeing to the gist of this Social Contract I'm beginning to feel some reservations due to the hurry at which it has been accepted and implemented. I feel concerns like darrow's have been left unaddressed. I also feel as if DC's attempt to abide by the language of the developing contract was completely blown off which causes me to call into question the contract's fundamental validity.
I'm sure we won't be able to get everyone on board...
Submitted by Rick on Wed, 12/05/2007 - 3:29pm....before going live. But I'm hopeful that they will see the value of the Social Contract once we've had a chance to see it in action in conjunction with our Bylaws. I also think we need to build in accountability for docents as well. Would you like to tackle that part?
> Say something interesting or say nothing at all. <
a couple of talking points
Submitted by enpen on Wed, 12/05/2007 - 5:37pm.The individual members of the OlyBlog community are responsible for protecting each other and visitors to the blog from uncivil abuse and personal threats. Civility is not just a word; it must be present in all our interactions. Members of the community must be allowed to exercise the rights accorded them to voice their opinions with respect to basic matters of policy and other issues.
and
An essential condition for community is the freedom and right on the part of an individual or group to express minority, unpopular, or controversial points of view. Only if minority and unpopular points of view are tolerated and given opportunity for expression will OlyBlog provide bona fide opportunities for significant consciousness raising. There shall be no discrimination at OlyBlog based on race, sex, age, handicap, sexual orientation, religious or political belief, or national origin in considering individuals' membership.
Between these two paragraphs it seems pretty clear that we are to be held to the same standards as everyone else and that when a contributing member of OlyBlog points out that we are acting in a manner of "uncivil abuse" it is as true a warning as if a docent were to point out like behavior by somebody else. I would be comfortable allowing OlyBlog members to call a vote of no confidence in any given docent at any given time, the results of which would decide on replacing or retaining the docent in question.
I'm having a difficult time resolving the language of "(a)ll must share alike in...resolving differences through a process with a strong will to collaboration" with hoping that people will see the Social Contract's value post implementation. Yes, the Contract has been made available as a Wiki in order to encourage collaborative creation. Yes, given some of the recent negative disruptions and their ensuing silences on OlyBlog an expedient development of social codes with which to hold ourselves accountable to each other feels desirous. However, I think maybe setting a predetermined amount of time wherein the Wiki is open for collaboration and the topic is open to debate is good. I lobby for a month. I think that gives us time to acclimate to some of the new personalities as well as time to sleep on the language.
We've tried "no rules" long enough.
Submitted by Rick on Wed, 12/05/2007 - 6:28pm.It's time to try something else. We can work out the bugs on the fly.
> Say something interesting or say nothing at all. <
collaboration
Submitted by enpen on Wed, 12/05/2007 - 10:06pm.Here's my deal: I agree with the language of this Social Contract and I endorse it as a means to an end.
Pushing through this Social Contract is in direct violation of its stipulation that "(a)ll must share alike in...resolving differences through a process with a strong will to collaboration." We shouldn't kid ourselves, in establishing the contract right now we're not abiding by it. If a like situation arises it will, however, allow the community to stop it.
Agreed.
Submitted by Rick on Wed, 12/05/2007 - 10:16pm.I think having the contract will give us a tool that we can use. But there's something else going on here: you can't force people to collaborate if they don't want to. There are some who are just never going to buy into something they think is a "speech code" or a tool for persecuting people with a particular viewpoint. The only way they'll get on board is by demonstrating that it will result in a fair, transparent, and predictable system.
> Say something interesting or say nothing at all. <
frame
Submitted by enpen on Thu, 12/06/2007 - 7:47am.