|
|
||
|
Navigation User login Who's online There are currently 3 users and 12 guests online.
Online users
Support OlyBlog OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation: Who's new
|
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Tue, 10/14/2008 - 8:27pm.
The city of Olympia was part of a performance audit by the State Auditor on a handful of local governments and how they collect and use impact fees. I won't have time to read the entire report tonight (warning big pdf file), so if anyone else wants to take a crack at it before I get to, have at it. Sorry for not posting the the entire report on scribd, but for some reason, the publicly paid for report is password protected and won't convert. Here are some highlights though. On fire fees:
On park fees:
|
OlyBlog.net OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you. If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here. Latest Classified Ads Upcoming events
|
Me and EFF
Submitted by emmettoconnell on Tue, 10/14/2008 - 8:30pm.A start...
Submitted by Thad Curtz on Fri, 10/17/2008 - 3:25pm.Total cost of the audit - $726,466
Total possible real savings located - $76,000 over ten years (not taking into consideration any costs of implementing the changes in software systems required to produce this possible savings). Hmmm...
Other suggestions made about possible changes in how impact fees are collected -
1. Under the phrasing of the current law, it's possible that cities should not be spending impact fees for covering increased fire protection costs on trucks, but only on buildings.
2. It's possible that Olympia doesn't spend the part of its impact fees that's intended to cover new neighborhood parks on parks that are sufficiently close to the new developments that are producing the impact fees - though they didn't look at whether those areas get their share of parks over time.
3. Cities may not be keeping the interest earned on impact fees divided up so each kind of fee keeps its own interest.
4. Maybe Olympia's current way of calculating the impact fees for fire protection collects more than the increases in costs for new developments, or maybe it collects less.
Plus some rather complicated stuff about the best way to calculate transportation impact fees that I gave up on...
Best,
Thad