User login

Who's online

There are currently 8 users and 39 guests online.

Online users

  • Mahalia
  • theunabonger
  • oldtimeydave
  • einmaleins
  • Laurian
  • systematist
  • jusbytheclown
  • Chia

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

  • olympianwatch
  • mpeper
  • BalletArtsOlymp...
  • gail
  • soemone

    Creative Commons License
 
Submitted by Robert Whitlock on Thu, 03/06/2008 - 7:10pm.

What bothers me about what happened at Evergreen after the Dead Prez show is this question; why didn't the police utilize nonviolent options of resolving the conflict before escalating and resorting to violence?

For example, why didn't police use a bull horn to inform the crowd to back away from the surrounded vehicle so that the suspect could subsequently be safely released? It mightn't have been effective - but why wasn't such an effort made?

The destructive behavior on the part of the post-concert-crowd occurred only after police entered the assemblage of concert-goers and utilized pepper spray.

This question has probably been raised elsewhere, but I wanted to bring it up now in case it hasn't - or in case it hasn't been adequately addressed.

[edit:] In addition: I think it's important. Did the police exhaust all options and sincerely attempt with all earnestness to defuse the situation without resorting to violence? If not, then I think this is a matter of police conduct that is worthy of further analysis.

»

This is where peoples

This is where peoples opinions differ, mainly because the video cuts almost immediately to the oly PD entering the crowd. Here is what is missing that is very important to the story: The arresting officer was yelling at people to step back, sayingshe would release him. Thurston County was also trying to spread this announcement while standing around the car. After she realized people were not listening, she stood on the push bars on her vehicle and announced that he was being let go. This did not deter the crowd: they were too loud and the chanting made it impossible for most people to hear. The crowd was too big and too loud. As she walked around the vehicle to do this, she saw that people placed their feet under the tires and were not going to move. And while we are on the topic of violent behavior, keep this in mind: Before the OPD arrived, while the Evergreen officer was sitting in the vehicle gathering info from the arrestee, she indicated that she was unable to see out the windows of the patrol vehicle because they were covered in spit. She also writes in her police report she could hear the sounds of the car being dented. Also it should be noted that the police report from OPD indicates that as they approached the crowd, the people in the front began interlocking their arms. This is not visible from the view of the camera. It explains why the first officer aggressively grabs to move the folks in front.

But I am Just Another Voice

»

Thanks for sharing that voice

and Yes, it has been raised Bert. I think originally by Rick. No mention of a bullhorn though. I don't think that is an issued piece of equipment to each officer though.

»

backup officers

Why didn't officers who arrived as backup use the P.A. systems on their vehicles to make an announcement?
»

Dunno

But seriously Bert, if a bunch of cars with flashing light isn't gonna do it, why would someone with a loudspeaker? It sounds like the crowd was pretty hopped up and ready to go.

EDIT: Maybe someone with more experience in police procedure could help out here?

»

In Response

The destructive behavior on the part of the post-concert-crowd occurred only after police entered the assemblage of concert-goers and utilized pepper spray.

Why did there need to be any destructive behavior on the part of the post-concert-crowd?  There was no need to intimidate or threaten an officer trying to do her job.  In fact, that's illegal. 

There was no need to destroy a police car to make any point.  If the post-concert-crowd was upset, they should have filed complaints with the police departments, not resort to destroying government property.

Would bullhorns really have done any good at any point?  Would rioters have listened and obeyed orders?  I doubt it.

"A point of view is only a view from a point..." ~ Unknown

»

I need to stop

This dead horse is so incredibly dead that we are really doing a disservice by not having a burial. Anyone else with me?

»

Yes. Music is the mediator

Yes. 

Music is the mediator between the spiritual and the sensual life. ~Ludwig van Beethoven

»

Thank you OG, I needed that....seriously.

nt
»

Yes!

It helps. After a long day of skiing I love sitting by a fire and listening to music. Very relaxing!
»

I think it's important

Did the police exhaust all options and sincerely attempt with all earnestness to defuse the situation without resorting to violence? If not, then I think this is a matter of police conduct that is worthy of further analysis.
»

I meant the back and forth

I agree with you, to a point. One thing that seems to be forgotten is that the police are also human. No matter how much training police receive, unless you want a robot patrolling your streets, people are going to fall back on human instinct. People are going to respond to protect themselve, protect their own etc.

Again, I wasn't trying to make a shot at you. I just think I'm done. Maybe the police could have handled it better, I don't know. Given the situation though I can't say I blame them for taking their course of action, and I have little doubt that it was all going to go to hell anyway.

»

I don't think you're asking

I don't think you're asking the right people when you ask here.  JT (TFI) would be the only one that I know of who could talk about it professionally but it's inappropriate for him to comment here.  City council may be able to help, maybe other city officials, maybe even the chief would respond to pointed questions.

»

Um, violence is bad

...m'kay?

 

»

Interesting Comments

(I better hurry up and post before a docent decides enough is enough.)

Bert,

You seem to be trying very hard to deflect any and all blame for this incident squarely on the shoulders of OPD, TCSO and EVPD.  Your opinion, not shared by many. 

Just another Voice has made a very good response to your pleas to garner support for those arrested.  I'll add my two cents based on professional experiences.  However, lets keep in mind a few things here.  I'll do my best not to repeat what Voice has already posted.  But the OPD was called in after the students surrounded a police officer.  I don't know about you bert but I have been surrounded by very angry people who have refused to obey or even acknowledge simple requests, then demands then orders.  Would you be just a little bit worried?  The fact that this group showed there utter disrespect for anyone in authority should be a clue. 

You also need to keep in mind possibly the mindset of the concer goers.  They are still feeling wronged 'by the man' aka OPD for any perceived actions that happened during the November Port Protests and it was pretty clear that the favorite F(*( the Pigs mantra was quite loud that night.  Now lets factor in a hip hop group who advocates anarchy or whatnot against anything that resembles law and order. 

Now lets factor in the attitudes of the police.  Were they aggressive?  Hard for me to sit back and play judge and jury when it's convenient that there is only a small portion of the video shown.  A few friends in Olympia (both on the force and TESC administration) tell me that the EVPD officer was very worried for what might happen.  The students showed very little respect for her (see Voices statement) and for her duty that night.  What was said to the police when they showed up?  Do you know?  I don't!  As already stated, the police showed up with lights.  What does that imply to most thinking people?  What does it say when you show up and you hear chants of 'F*(& you' Go home! 

Now for personal experiences.  When you show up to a crowd surrounding a fellow officer you do what you can to ensure her safety and those around her.  As you can imagine there are those at TESC who have no respect for police.  Don't you think the OPD knows this?  In my experiences you want to strive to ensure that nobody is seriously injured or worse, killed.  That happened.  I'm surprised it wasn't worse than it was.  People degrade the 'Bald headed' cop, but what was happening before he was video-taped? 

Bullhorns/PA's are not a requirement to be used.  It helps, but the chanting would have made it impossible for most people to hear it. 

Police aren't perfect and they make mistakes.  We ask them to be perfect all the while we forget they are human.  We ask them to make split second decisions then second guess them on anonymous message boards.  We ask police to protect us but then criticize them when they do just that.  It's a never ending story.  Did OPD make mistakes here?  I don't know, show me a tape of everything that happened.  If you want to comment on the selected videos, the only difference I would have done was use stun grenades.  It quickly disperses a loud potentially violent group and the ringing effects in the ears wears off just as quick.  I don't think I would have engaged anyone.  It appears as though if you 'touch' a TESC student or supporter you are now in the middle of a civil suit.

(I must be having a bad evening as that is the most I have ever written!)

»

The Dream Police

»

scary

Now, that is scary.
»

Agreed

nt

»

I realize that you just sat

I realize that you just sat in on the arraignment today, so these ideas and questions are immediate. We did already go through a series of arguments regarding these same questions/issues.

I'm going to ask two questions of you: 1) In the comings weeks, would you please pay attention to the defense attorneys abilities to effectively bring up these questions? 2) Would you please take into consideration the possible negative reactions of your fellow OlyBloggers to information that has already been fought over?

I don't think you're intentionally being antagonistic here. I do think your post is an antagonist.

"In principle, I am an anarchist. Kurt Vonnegut once said he was an agnostic who respects Jesus Christ. I am an anarchist who loves democracy." - Kenzaburo Oe

»

Is your comment

Is your comment in response to mine? If yes, help me understand how my post was antagonistic(sp). Thanks!
»

It was directed to bert.

Unless you sat through the arraignment today also.

image
»

Thank you

I was getting somewhat lost.
»

Okay

It's not intentionally antagonistic, if it is.

What I am saying is that while five young people are being arraigned, there is no official and parallel inquiry being conducted into the actions of the police that night. Actions by the police, which may have prompted or provoked further unnecessary violence that night.

I am not defending the actions of those who spit on the police vehicle or engaged in other manners of unrest.

A parallel investigation and prosecution of the police response may be in order. I didn't mean to antagonize, and I apologize if I did.

I am interested to know what in specific seems antagonistic.

»

It has been said here

that an independent review is happening on campus.

image
»

okay

So, in light of that my post would seem to be superfluous and redundant. I would gladly remove it from the front page if that seems appropriate.
»

I don't think you should remove it at all.

I do think enpen's advice was good.

image
»

I would think

I would think "A parallel investigation and prosecution of the police response may be in order" would count as antagonistic. 

You are asking for an investigaton and prosecution of the police.  I.e, they are already guilty of something to be prosecuted OR the actions of OPD rises to a level required to charge a criminal violation. 

I could go on but I don't think it would do much good.  These types of posts get people very upset and works to further divide people much like P. Bohmer's statement that students/witnesses should NOT cooperate with local law enforcement. 

»

Do you think questioning police procedures in general is bad?

If I look at this event, for instance, I see fault on all sides. I think it's appropriate to make police review a part of the process so that we can avoid violence in the future. I think it's possible to change procedures so that situations don't become escalated. The police have a system with which they operate, and systems, by their nature have, or develop, flaws. These systems must be tweaked from time to time so that they operate more efficiently. This, for example, is why we have a congress that creates and repeals laws depending on how society evolves.

image
»

That's Understandable

I don't think that I want to get people worked up, and I don't think it serves the function of fostering dialogue or developing understanding.

I can see that the advocacy of accountability for police might seem antagonistic when viewed from the perspective of law enforcement (especially if there is legitimate reason to suspect that some mishandling of the situation may have occurred.)

Questioning the appropriateness of various police actions during the post-concert unrest seems reasonable, especially considering the losses.

That said I don't think the behavior of the concert-goers was appropriate either. Just asking whether the situation could have been handled differently. I am sorry if that seems adversarial.

Local police, in my opinion, serve an important function, but there is a history of treating certain populations with antagonism.

This should not be divisive. It's a simple question: was the law enforcement reaction to post-concert-unrest appropriate?

That said, I think it's probably best to let it go, in light of the formation of a task force to deal with this question at Evergreen.

»

it's the topic

I think these are legitimate and good things to ask. I think the outcome of bringing it up on OlyBlog without any new information is an almost guaranteed argument with absolutely nobody changing their minds and, more likely than not, some people becoming unreasonably entrenched. In short, I'm requesting that you give serious consideration before starting a new post on the topic without new information.

"In principle, I am an anarchist. Kurt Vonnegut once said he was an agnostic who respects Jesus Christ. I am an anarchist who loves democracy." - Kenzaburo Oe

»

that makes sense

Thanks enpen, I appreciate your constructive criticism.
»

Good response

and I agree with Enpen. I hope I didn't come across badly either, that wasn't my intention. Good pics of the court room btw.
»

ah c'mon Norm

Give me at least a little credit. If I were on a Norm hunt and you came across badly, then I should be all over it.

Or maybe I'm a lazy hunter and I'm just busy building a Norm stand... ;-)

"In principle, I am an anarchist. Kurt Vonnegut once said he was an agnostic who respects Jesus Christ. I am an anarchist who loves democracy." - Kenzaburo Oe

»

lol, thanks I needed that this morning

Seriously though, Norm is out of season, and a little bit "Gamey" this time of year. So leave the stand at home and invest in a fishing rod. :)
»

One thing I've noticed...

...in all of these comments over the last couple of weeks, is that no one has yet blamed St. Valentine's Day.

Could this whole holiday havoc be the hallmark of Hallmark?

A google search for .valentine's violence. turns up tons of crap I don't feel like clicking on right now. Did you know there is a band called Valentine's and Violence?

Anyhoo, it's obvious that there's a corelation between the Violence and Valentine's Day. I'm sure Violas fit in here somewhere, too.

 

»

Talk about prejudicial language

Quoth bert:

[W]hy didn't the police utilize nonviolent options of resolving the conflict before escalating and resorting to violence?
How do you know they didn't try? The bits of video footage won't give you a full picture, because they only contain what the editors want you to see, and that may not include attempts by the various police agencies involved to use (never say "utilize" when "use" will do) non-violent methods prior to resorting to force.

According to TESC Police Services officer MEYERS, after she had arrested Kaylen WILLIAMS inside the CRC and was in the process of escorting him to her patrol car, she was accosted, first in the the CRC foyer, and again outside the CRC by her vehicle, by a group of concert attendees who objected to the arrest. Officer MEYERS has stated that she attempted to explain to the group that she had probable cause to arrest WILLIAMS (on the basis of a complaint made by an event security volunteer, who alleged that WILLIAMS had punched him in the face), and that if the members of the group believed that the information upon which she (MEYERS) was acting was incorrect or incomplete, she would be happy to take names and contact information so that she could take statements at the earliest opportunity.

Officer MEYERS also stated that she had the TESC dispatcher request backup units via CAPCOM for the purpose of administrative support; her intent was to leave the TCSO deputies at the CRC to take statements from anyone willing to come forward while she transported WILLIAMS to Sem. I to formally read him his rights and subsequently take any statement he wished to make (i.e. get his side of the story).

However, when MEYERS tried to drive away from the CRC to Sem. I, the protestors blocked her route. At least two of the TCSO deputies (the lieutenant and the sergeant, whose names I do not know) moved to flank MEYERS' patrol car, and were subsequently surrounded by the (growing) crowd that gathered around MEYERS' vehicle. The TCSO lieutenant (and possibly others) attempted to explain to the crowd that WILLIAMS would only be taken to Sem. I (rather than the county jail) for processing, and would probably be released once his identity and contact info had been recorded. With thecrowd pressing closer (and certain members reportedly trying to snatch the deputies' guns), the TCSO lieutenant called for reinforcements, but instructed they should keep at a distance and not intervene until further notice.

With the crowd growing more unruly, and chanting (among other things) "let him go," the TCSO lieutenant suggested to officer MEYERS that she take WILLIAMS' ID and contact information and release him, so that he could questioned (and if necessary, charged) at a later date. MEYERS consented, and both she and the TCSO lieutenant attempted to explain to the crowd that they were going to release the arrestee. By this point, most of the crowd wasn't listening.

While Officer MEYERS took down WILLIAMS' info, and subsequently released him, the TCSO lieutenant, feeling the safety of the officers within the crowd was in jeopardy, requested (by radio) the backup units (OPD) to break through the crowd to relieve the surrounded officers. When OPD moved in, people at the outer edges of the crowd locked arms to prevent them from creating an opening. It was only at this point, with 3-5 officers at the center of the crowd at credible risk of severe injury (note: people in the crowd had tried to snatch their guns), that OPD opted to use force to create an opening.

By the accounts of members of various police agencies involved, they tried for over half and hour to de-escalate the situation using non-violent methods. When OPD arrived, they didn't immediately wade in, going off at half-cock and swinging batons and spraying OC left and right; they stood by until the TCSO lieutenant asked them to intervene, and they employed force only after meeting with resistance.
Admittedly, OPD employed force immediately upon encountering resistance, but this was after they'd been able to observe that the crowd wasn't responding to attempts at de-escalation.

Now, if there's evidence that contradicts this version of evetns, I'd like to see it. Claims to the effect of "there's no footage of Meyers at al. trying non-violent de-escalation because they never tried it" doesn't cut it; the CAPCOM logs indicate that there was a roughly 30-minute period between TCSO deputies arriving the CRC and the OPD breaking into the crowd with batons and OC. If Officer MEYERS and the TCSO deputies were escalating the situation during that time, there should be footage of at least part of it (What, you want me to believe that nobody had a camera handy until the second OPD busted out the pepper spray? Bullshit.), and I want to see it.

»

Scratch that

I'm only just looking at the video posted on Youtube by the Geoduck Student Union. Notice how the phalanx (for want of a better word), consisting of 5 OPD officers and 1 female TCSO deputy (presumably Dep. GALLAGHER) manage to work their way to Officer MEYERS' vehicle without evidently resorting to OC?
There's maybe some "one hand at each end of the baton"-forcing-away stuff going on, but no whacking with the batons, or indeed use of OC until you see the crowd suddenly get away from the left rear quarter of MEYERS' patrol car with accompanying screaming.

Hey, you notice how, even in the shots from the top of the stairs (by the designated smoking area) looking down (and if you don't know what I'm talking about, you have no business commenting on Evergreen-related stuff) you can only see the roof of MEYERS' patrol car, and it's damn near impossible to make out individual figures next to the car? Now imagine you're an OPD officer trying to ascertain whether a TESC police officer or TCSO deputy right by the car, in the middle of the crowd, is perfectly all right, or is getting beaten up in there. Every second you hesitate might be crucial; do you intervene or not?

So let's recap. We have MEYERS and two or three TCSO deputies in the middle of the crowd, and going by the Geoduck video, we have 6 (count 'em, 6; 5 OPD, 1 TCSO) cops coming to their rescue. So that's 8-9 cops against 150-200 potentially violent protestors. Damn, the protestors obviously never stood a chance with that weight of numbers; damn the Man for being able to bring such oppressive numbers to bear.

So what are we left with? The Greener "Uprising" is perfectly capable of overturning a police car, provided there aren't actually any police officers nearby, since a single police officer can easily subdue some 20 students single-handedly, even without resorting to handcuffs,let alone batons and OC.

»

If you get a call that

If you get a call that there's a large crowd surrounding a few officers, you don't go into the situation with the mindset that you're going to be asking the crowd to "please step away."

The time for talking ended a long time ago.

»

1:22AM (Dispatch reads back

1:22AM (Dispatch reads back this time to tape) "When Olympia comes in, let 'em know we need helmets, they're starting to throw stuff."

That says it all - it especially says something about the people who insisted there was no trouble at all until the OPD showed up. It's one thing for an armchair pundit to have taken the concertgoers' side and believed that without any evidence - but for those who were actually there, it makes them nothing but liars.

»

I'd say the only defensable ground

prior to seeing this new information was to believe neither side and see what the evidence says. Not sure what this says about the "people who insisted there was no trouble at all until the OPD showed up" other than they are less inclined to believe the police than others are.
»

How about those who were

How about those who were actually there, they would have known things were being thrown at the deputies - then they turn around and say there was "no trouble" until OPD arrived.

»

I was responding to your criticism of "arm chair" pundits

Move all other goal posts at will. I'm just happy to have more facts.
»

Rob

I have never said that police are above the law are that there approaches to situations should not be reviewed.  In my experiences whenever there is a confrontation that lead to multiple arrests many reviews are done.  Debriefings happen to ensure that the situation was handled appropriately.

We also forget that the police (TCSO I think) was quoted as saying that students were tugging at there holstered guns.  Scary thought.

Unfortunately I have come across law enforcement that has done some stupid things and many officers have gone to jail.  I think bert is trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill with his constant pleas to deflect blame from 1) the organizers of this event 2) the concert goers who got out of hand. 

 

»

Evergreen 5

The "Valentine 5" reminds people of Al Capone's night of the long knives. This group should be called the Evergreen 5.
»

The "High Five" would be a lot funnier

Personally, the less they are asociated with Evergreen, the better.
»

Also, one of them isn't a student there.

image
»

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Now playing at:

Latest Classified Ads

The Evergreen State College

Get Firefox!


More Flickr photos tagged with "olympia" and "washington"

OlyBlog is a site for news and discussion about Olympia, Washington.
free hit counter