The undemocratic nature of Olympia Film Society

Navigation

User login

Online users

The Fire Inside
JstPlnOnry

Support OlyBlog

OlyBlog is run by volunteers who care about Olympia. If you like what we're doing, make a donation:

OlyBlog is powered by:

Who's new

colormagician
wilybadger
Mariner719
stiks071
banyantreenich

The undemocratic nature of Olympia Film Society

Submitted by emmettoconnell on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 2:09pm.

Here is what has really been bothering me about the recent blowup at OFS (here and here at the Olympian). The board of directors actually isn't elected from the membership. Rather, it is self appointing.

The current members of the board choose all new incoming members. From the OFS bylaws, posted up at OFSvolunteers:

Any member of the Society wishing to serve as a Director must submit to the Board prior to a regularly scheduled meeting a letter of application summarizing their experience with the Society and their interest in serving on the Board, outlining any particular skills they would bring to the Board, and indicating whether they are applying for a one or two year term. Letters of application to the Board shall be posted in the lobby for not less than two weeks before the meeting at which the applicant is to be considered by the Board. The Board shall also solicit and consider member input on the applications in whatever method (letter, email, verbal testimony to the Board) is deemed appropriate by the Board. The Board shall retain the power to determine the appropriate method. Following an interview by the Board at a regularly scheduled meeting, a member may be appointed to the Board.

Now, here's my question: Would you trust a board that is put together in such a manner?

Also, there's a new explainer over at OFSvolunteers called: How did the board fudge the bylaws?

emmettoconnell's blog
Login or register to post comments

Excellent question

Submitted by blagoblag on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 2:12pm.

In addition to question of how new board members get approved, I wonder how many people self-select out of the process because of perceived cronyism or personality conflicts?

A few years ago I was interested in joining the board, but I heard from an insider how difficult a particular board member was to work with, so I never followed through.

Ugh!!!

Submitted by blagoblag on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 3:02pm.

Thanks for the new link!

"If the board had not added a fifth member, they would not have been able to take the vote. The board achieved quorum by adding a fifth member who was committed to stand aside before knowing the subject of the vote."

That's really, really icky! Sounds like they all need to learn what consensus means.

This sounds like an organization

Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 2:40pm.

that needs to be more accountable to its memebers. Does someone have a link to the OFS by-laws. Perhaps it's time for a popular revolution.

Bylaws

Submitted by blagoblag on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 2:52pm.

http://www.ofsvolunteers.com/mediawiki/index.php/Ofs_bylaws

This committee of one,

Submitted by Mary Baker Eddy on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 2:43pm.

This committee of one, self-appointed, has voted to flip the bird at OFS's current Board of Directors.

I'm debating whether or not I'll bother with the Film Festival. It's always been fun, but not as fun as before. Crispin Glover, Russ Meyer, those were film festivals.

Do I understand correctly

Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 3:11pm.

that at the time of the vote there were only 5 board members serving on the board instead of the required 8? The bylaws clearly state the the remining member of the board have an obligation to keep a minimum of 8 members on the board. How can they talk about a quorum with a staight face? They didn't have a quorum, they had a board with fewer members than the bylaws require. A quorum of 5 presupposes a board membership of 8. Ridiculous!

Fuzzy math

Submitted by blagoblag on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 3:24pm.

I believe there were 5 established board members, 4 of whom were in attendance at that meeting. There were also 3 prospective new board members in attendance, for a total of 7 board members present (8 total).

However, the established board members asked the 3 new members to stand aside on the vote, without telling them the subject of the vote. In other words, they wanted to count them for the purpose of having a quorum of at least 5, but they dictated that the new members must not vote to block. This is a complete distortion of consensus-based decision making.

When the subject of the vote was revealed, two of the 3 new board members expressed their discomfort and were "removed from the board for the remainder of the meeting." This left one new board member who had agreed to stand aside before even knowing the subject of the vote, plus the four established board members, meeting the quorum of 5.

Somebody please correct me if I've got this wrong, but I'm afraid I haven't.

If your story is right

Submitted by Guglielmo on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 3:28pm.

that vote doesn't pass the smell test. Not one bit. I'm surprized they fired an employee based on such a tenuous and bad-faith interpretation of their bylaws. If Mr. Bartone is litigious, I think he'd get his job back. Those directors should resign for "working" the rules the way they did. It's a film soiciety for God's sake, not Chicago politics!

That's my understanding as well

Submitted by emmettoconnell on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 3:38pm.

Unfortunately, the Olympian story didn't touch on the apparent abuse of process aspect of this story, just on Jeff personally. Anyway, that's the center of my feelings towards this.

Meeting Sunday

Submitted by concerned on Sat, 09/01/2007 - 5:59pm.

FYI There is a meeting planned for interested volunteers, OFS members and community members scheduled for Sunday @ 7pm @ Heritage Park at the picnic tables near the Public Restrooms. Please come and familiarize yourself as much as possible with this issue before hand: www.ofsvolunteers.com Check out the newest updates (boards response to volunteers demands).

Please Join!

Submitted by Zero_One on Sun, 09/02/2007 - 11:01pm.

I would like to encourage anyone out there who has an interest in film to become a member and participate in this unique Olympia resource. It's not enough to just come and watch movies there but we need to work to keep it alive and well. If you are already a member please get connected and contribute however you can.

OlyBlog.net

OlyBlog is devoted to citizen journalism, including hyperlocal news and discussion specifically about Olympia, Washington. If you care about this community and are tired of corporate media, then this is the place for you.

If you'd like to contribute, please register for an account. Here is a list of local news beats that need to be covered. You can post your news as a personal blog entry, and it will be reviewed (and possibly edited) for promotion to the front page. Once you've established a record of responsible blogging, you can become an autonomous user. You can also send news via email. All members of OlyBlog agree to abide by our comment and fair use policies. If you are frustrated about something said in a comment thread, go here.

Now playing at: